Double Quantization analysis detects the traces left by consecutive JPEG compressions on an image. When a spliced region from one image is inserted into another, if the compression histories of the two images differ, the discrepancy may be detected by this algorithm. A typical case of forgery that is detectable by this algorithm is when an item is taken from an image of high quality (or an uncompressed image, or an image that had its past JPEG traces destroyed by scaling/filtering) and placed in an image of lower quality. If the resulting spliced image is then saved as at a high quality, this should result in a successful detection. In the output map, red values (=1) correspond to high probability of a single compression for the corresponding block, while low values (=0) correspond to low probability of single compression. Localized red areas in an otherwise blue image are very likely to contain splices. Images with non-localized high values and values in the range (0.2-0.8) (green/yellow/orange) should not be taken into account.
It's not fake because if someone did it it would be an official coup and Trump would immediately said it's fake and had full rights to act on it, it's just dumb to give him such a gift 1 week before the end of the term. This would only work if Trump was dead, which would be extremely hard to cover considering how many people contact with him daily, someone would have risen a flag by now.
what looks sketchy to me is the top of his hair glitches around randomly especially when he changes his stance where he loses height, completely unnatural but i don't know if it's acting up because of a green screen or not
As someone who worked as a video editor for 20 years, I knew it was a deepfake by just looking at it for 10 seconds.
thank you for setting the record straight for all these losers
Double Quantization analysis detects the traces left by consecutive JPEG compressions on an image. When a spliced region from one image is inserted into another, if the compression histories of the two images differ, the discrepancy may be detected by this algorithm. A typical case of forgery that is detectable by this algorithm is when an item is taken from an image of high quality (or an uncompressed image, or an image that had its past JPEG traces destroyed by scaling/filtering) and placed in an image of lower quality. If the resulting spliced image is then saved as at a high quality, this should result in a successful detection. In the output map, red values (=1) correspond to high probability of a single compression for the corresponding block, while low values (=0) correspond to low probability of single compression. Localized red areas in an otherwise blue image are very likely to contain splices. Images with non-localized high values and values in the range (0.2-0.8) (green/yellow/orange) should not be taken into account.
you lost me bud :(
It sounds highly complex so it must be a deep fake.
source other than just this picture?
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/fake-news-debunker-by-inv/mhccpoafgdgbhnjfhkcmgknndkeenfhe
Test a screenshot yourself.
I would say Deep Fried.
you caught me
It's not fake because if someone did it it would be an official coup and Trump would immediately said it's fake and had full rights to act on it, it's just dumb to give him such a gift 1 week before the end of the term. This would only work if Trump was dead, which would be extremely hard to cover considering how many people contact with him daily, someone would have risen a flag by now.
I wonder if we will see more deepfakes as the president is rumored to award the medal of freedom tomorrow and visit Texas this week.
what looks sketchy to me is the top of his hair glitches around randomly especially when he changes his stance where he loses height, completely unnatural but i don't know if it's acting up because of a green screen or not