Q might be a smart crew of internet trolling for all I know ... But the argument doesn't make much sense. If Q was aimed at creating violence, why was their no calls for violence? Why was it a message of unity and internet crowd sourcing research?
There is more evidence that Barnes is just a self-important grifter.
Q is convincing people that the military, intelligence agencies etc are all on their side...remember trust Barr? They use cult-like techniques, such as pledging allegiance to the movement.
You also had Q saying that Julian Assange shouldn't be pardoned because he's secretly helping Trump.
It's distracting people from being productive and actually spreading the true populist revolution.
I do get that angle. But that's a lot of energy to just suck resources. Especially resources of people who were low or no energy before. Now they are amped up for better or worse.
If the Q authors wanted to harm people or Trump movement, why stop at internet research? Why not entrap them in crimes?
Q might be a smart crew of internet trolling for all I know ... But the argument doesn't make much sense. If Q was aimed at creating violence, why was their no calls for violence? Why was it a message of unity and internet crowd sourcing research?
There is more evidence that Barnes is just a self-important grifter.
Q is convincing people that the military, intelligence agencies etc are all on their side...remember trust Barr? They use cult-like techniques, such as pledging allegiance to the movement. You also had Q saying that Julian Assange shouldn't be pardoned because he's secretly helping Trump.
It's distracting people from being productive and actually spreading the true populist revolution.
I do get that angle. But that's a lot of energy to just suck resources. Especially resources of people who were low or no energy before. Now they are amped up for better or worse.
If the Q authors wanted to harm people or Trump movement, why stop at internet research? Why not entrap them in crimes?