The National Socialists were a lot of things but they weren't cowards. The nine million Germans who died trying to hold off Bolshevism are a testament to that.
The Catholic Church did not support the NSDAP, before the seizure of power they prohibited wearing uniforms during services and some bishops banned members from receiving the sacrements.
The poltical Catholic party did vote for the enabling act, but that was after Hitler was appointed Chancellor. In Prussia the Catholic Center party was fine with entering into a coalition with the Social Democrats in running a state government that banned the Brownshirts and threw them in jail for self defense against Communists.
Regarding George Prescott Bush, he managed Fritz Thyssen's assets during the war but Thyssen had turned against the NSDAP at that point and was in exile in France or from 1940-1945 he was in a concentration camp, when Bush got in trouble for still holding the assets of a German citizen (even one in a concentration camp).
Edward VIII sympathied with Germany and maybe if he had remained king he wouldn't have given a Poland a guaruntee to occupy ethnicly German lands and Britain would have kept her Empire.
The Catholic Church did not support the NSDAP, before the seizure of power they prohibited wearing uniforms during services and some bishops banned members from receiving the sacrements.
What were the ratlines?
You tell me the jesuits came to support nazism during the war?
The poltical Catholic party did vote for the enabling act, but that was after Hitler was appointed Chancellor.
Oh well, that’s not really “support” then. Right?
In Prussia the Catholic Center party was fine with entering into a coalition with the Social Democrats in running a state government that banned the Brownshirts and threw them in jail for self defense against Communists.
Was that party the same entity as the catholic church or, more accurately, the jesuits?
Regarding George Prescott Bush, he managed Fritz Thyssen's assets during the war but Thyssen had turned against the NSDAP at that point and was in exile in France or from 1940-1945 he was in a concentration camp, when Bush got in trouble for still holding the assets of a German citizen (even one in a concentration camp).
So is this guardian article rightly characterized as “anti Bush propaganda” then? Or would you characterize it as I would, namely, as “damage control”?
Edward VIII sympathied with Germany and maybe if he had remained king he wouldn't have given a Poland a guaruntee to occupy ethnicly German lands and Britain would have kept her Empire.
Britain never lost the empire. She engineered the whole war and ratcheted up the City of London’s power starting immediately after the war. Now virtually every country in the world participates in their IMF/BIS central banking scheme. In what sense did Britain lose anything besides obligations to keep boots on the ground?
Bet you wouldn't believe that Nazis held several pro-American rallies in New York, warning of the jew takeover of your banks and media....
Are you talking about the fascist coup the globalist bankers attempted in America following the artificial 1929 crash they engineered as described by great patriot Smedley Butler? The ones Prescott Bush (known good guy family) was involved in?
Watch the nazi faggot get upset at me pointing this out.
Globalist bankers in wall street and the city of london backed the communists... and they backed the fascists.
nuh uh, that would cause a war!
Exactly. They pump up both sides, finance both sides, and the winner pays the loser’s reparations.
The Germans who fought for the nazis were mostly good patriots. That is why their occult faggot leaders led them into the Russian winter instead of killing the Queen’s troops at Dunkirk and invading the City of London or Switzerland and ending the wars once and for all.
And would you believe it, today’s nazis want us all to perish in the Russian (nuclearj winter again, so China can replace us.
We’re not nazis, because we’re not a globalist golem. We’re free men. Nationalist capitalists.
What is the evidence that bankers backed the Fascists? Wall Street and the US were sending guns to the USSR before Pearl Harbor. The expectation was after Dunkirk Britain would see reason and agree to peace with honor.
Regarding Russia, Stalin parked the largest invasion force in history on Germany's border. When Germany preempted his invasion they were outnumbered 4 to 1 on tanks and 3 to 1 on planes in the border region.
This article describes Prescott Bush and wall street’s continued support for the nazis right up to the declaration of war (I’m sure they stopped right then and there out of patriotism).
Plus the circumstantial evidence: 1913, Fed established, virtuous lend & buy cycle established with City of London making it possible to effectively “print” money. Immediately, WW1 is kicked off, everyone thought it would be quick because they thought their governments would all run out of money. After WW1, the Fed is still there. They fucked with the money supply, making cheap credit widely available, and encouraged everyone to buy stocks. The resulting bubble crashed when the credit spigot was closed... man made crash!
Immediately afterwards, there is a global push for fascism. Fascists insist upon full government control over the economy. Can you think of a reason why bankers would support such a movement? But! Fascists are abso-fuckin-lutely NOT communists, and react violently to the presence of communists. War was inevitable, but at least the bankers funded both sides of the war and had them agree the losers’ reparations would be paid by the winner. Can you think of any reason why the bankers would have wanted to encourage the rise of two virtually identical (from bankers’ POV) philosophies and set them at each others’ throats?
Banker support for fascism was an essential cog in their 20th century white genocide machine.
Wall Street and the US were sending guns to the USSR before Pearl Harbor.
Correct. They always control both sides. You didn’t think they left the fate of the world up to a fight between two roughly equal sides did you? (They were made roughly equal on purpose for maximum destruction/sales/reparations)
The expectation was after Dunkirk Britain would see reason and agree to peace with honor.
Was this a reasonable expectation? What did Hitler think of freemasons? Is it possible he didn’t know they answer to the British crown? What did Hitler think of Jewish people? Is it possible he didn’t know about Oliver Cromwell or the fact that England, which established modern Israel in 1918 Balfour Declaration, was zionist?
Shame he “perished in a fire that destroyed his entire body” so no one could ask him, eh?
Regarding Russia, Stalin parked the largest invasion force in history on Germany's border. When Germany preempted his invasion they were outnumbered 4 to 1 on tanks and 3 to 1 on planes in the border region.
Yet the only reason the Germans lost was because they foolishly invaded in the winter. Size isn’t everything...
Germany could have sat comfortably behind fortifications that the hapless soviets would never have penetrated. Indeed, forcing the Russian people to invade would probably have been the end of Stalin’s regime, he really needed those Russian patriots dead, and fast!
The bankers backed them AND the communists. They always control both sides.
If Hitler wanted to fuck globalist banker interests, he’d have invaded Switzerland and the City of London. The Soviets would have collapsed once their backers vanished.
But instead he sent millions of patriotic Germans to die in the Russian winter. The inevitable outcome of invading Russia in the winter. White genocide.
It’s possible to oppose globalism without falling into banker tyranny, which nazism certainly was. Watch and learn, nazi faggot.
''Normally used for the CIA but also used for agencies like the ATF, FBI, etc. Their inability to blend in to the native population's habits, patterns and speech makes them stick out like a sore thumb to the population, hence they "glow in the dark."
In the case of TD.win, government agents who try to pose as regular users but whose posts often include eg. calls to violence. They try to incite people to commit crimes, only to arrest them later.
''Normally used for the CIA but also used for agencies like the ATF, FBI, etc. Their inability to blend in to the native population's habits, patterns and speech makes them stick out like a sore thumb to the population, hence they "glow in the dark."
In the case of TD.win, government agents who try to pose as regular users but whose posts often include eg. calls to violence. They try to incite people to commit crimes, only to arrest them later.
The fbi and cia are compromised. Gary Webb proved it. Who they now work for is the question. So who benefits from their actions. I would say the US has been taken over by israel. They have the FED and all major media. The people who control israel worship lucifer. Instead of becoming a peaceful multi planet species like elon talks about we are being caged in.
Wow, my first ever sticky. Thanks
Well good thing you Finnished...
Okay I'll see myself out.
Late night sticky!
Based Finn
Sure, but we would have to communicate in English.
If he actually saw this meme, he would feel honored.
They've all willingly marked themselves.
Doesn't matter if Trump gives up now and lets them murder millions.
You're welcome
hey - what's a "glowie"....?
Government agents who, lately, have been posting with handshake accounts and trying to make us all seem to be nazis.
ok, got it - thanks, 'pede!!
God bless
Heil biden
Das KindersnifFühre
Commands a fleet of cowardly traitorous idiots that are 'just following orders'.
The National Socialists were a lot of things but they weren't cowards. The nine million Germans who died trying to hold off Bolshevism are a testament to that.
I get what you're saying about folks on the front line, I was referring to those domestically participating in genocide.
If we don't win, in 75 years they're going to teach our great grand children Trump was gassing illegals at the border.
Pretty sure they’re all getting arrested soon!
We need more commie memes.
Banker backed potayto, banker backed potahto.
I hope Wray is discovered dead on the shitter from a burst aneurysm or even goes out Elvis-style from too many "attacks." If only karma was real...
At least the SS were good looking
Lots of faggotry in their ranks too.
Peiper would turn any man gay, lol.
Seriously, though-- how did they wind up with that many gay men in one organization? It had to be higher than average.
No wonder the catholic church and the royals and Prescott Bush and the wall street tribe and others supported the nazis.
The Catholic Church did not support the NSDAP, before the seizure of power they prohibited wearing uniforms during services and some bishops banned members from receiving the sacrements.
The poltical Catholic party did vote for the enabling act, but that was after Hitler was appointed Chancellor. In Prussia the Catholic Center party was fine with entering into a coalition with the Social Democrats in running a state government that banned the Brownshirts and threw them in jail for self defense against Communists.
Regarding George Prescott Bush, he managed Fritz Thyssen's assets during the war but Thyssen had turned against the NSDAP at that point and was in exile in France or from 1940-1945 he was in a concentration camp, when Bush got in trouble for still holding the assets of a German citizen (even one in a concentration camp).
Edward VIII sympathied with Germany and maybe if he had remained king he wouldn't have given a Poland a guaruntee to occupy ethnicly German lands and Britain would have kept her Empire.
What were the ratlines?
You tell me the jesuits came to support nazism during the war?
Oh well, that’s not really “support” then. Right?
Was that party the same entity as the catholic church or, more accurately, the jesuits?
So is this guardian article rightly characterized as “anti Bush propaganda” then? Or would you characterize it as I would, namely, as “damage control”?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar
Britain never lost the empire. She engineered the whole war and ratcheted up the City of London’s power starting immediately after the war. Now virtually every country in the world participates in their IMF/BIS central banking scheme. In what sense did Britain lose anything besides obligations to keep boots on the ground?
Just learned what “glowies” came from the other day. Terry was a funny dude!
how does a 3 letter agency drop the ball so often and no one loses their job?
When they selectively go after wrongthink only.
Yeah they fought together against Bolshevism until things started looking tough for Germany and the Fins stabbed them in the back.
Are you talking about the fascist coup the globalist bankers attempted in America following the artificial 1929 crash they engineered as described by great patriot Smedley Butler? The ones Prescott Bush (known good guy family) was involved in?
Watch the nazi faggot get upset at me pointing this out.
Globalist bankers in wall street and the city of london backed the communists... and they backed the fascists.
Exactly. They pump up both sides, finance both sides, and the winner pays the loser’s reparations.
The Germans who fought for the nazis were mostly good patriots. That is why their occult faggot leaders led them into the Russian winter instead of killing the Queen’s troops at Dunkirk and invading the City of London or Switzerland and ending the wars once and for all.
And would you believe it, today’s nazis want us all to perish in the Russian (nuclearj winter again, so China can replace us.
We’re not nazis, because we’re not a globalist golem. We’re free men. Nationalist capitalists.
What is the evidence that bankers backed the Fascists? Wall Street and the US were sending guns to the USSR before Pearl Harbor. The expectation was after Dunkirk Britain would see reason and agree to peace with honor.
Regarding Russia, Stalin parked the largest invasion force in history on Germany's border. When Germany preempted his invasion they were outnumbered 4 to 1 on tanks and 3 to 1 on planes in the border region.
Smedley Butler/business plot in the US. The Fabian society in Canada.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar
This article describes Prescott Bush and wall street’s continued support for the nazis right up to the declaration of war (I’m sure they stopped right then and there out of patriotism).
Vatican support for mussolini:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-the-catholic-church-got-in-bed-with-mussolini
Plus the circumstantial evidence: 1913, Fed established, virtuous lend & buy cycle established with City of London making it possible to effectively “print” money. Immediately, WW1 is kicked off, everyone thought it would be quick because they thought their governments would all run out of money. After WW1, the Fed is still there. They fucked with the money supply, making cheap credit widely available, and encouraged everyone to buy stocks. The resulting bubble crashed when the credit spigot was closed... man made crash!
Immediately afterwards, there is a global push for fascism. Fascists insist upon full government control over the economy. Can you think of a reason why bankers would support such a movement? But! Fascists are abso-fuckin-lutely NOT communists, and react violently to the presence of communists. War was inevitable, but at least the bankers funded both sides of the war and had them agree the losers’ reparations would be paid by the winner. Can you think of any reason why the bankers would have wanted to encourage the rise of two virtually identical (from bankers’ POV) philosophies and set them at each others’ throats?
Banker support for fascism was an essential cog in their 20th century white genocide machine.
Correct. They always control both sides. You didn’t think they left the fate of the world up to a fight between two roughly equal sides did you? (They were made roughly equal on purpose for maximum destruction/sales/reparations)
Was this a reasonable expectation? What did Hitler think of freemasons? Is it possible he didn’t know they answer to the British crown? What did Hitler think of Jewish people? Is it possible he didn’t know about Oliver Cromwell or the fact that England, which established modern Israel in 1918 Balfour Declaration, was zionist?
Shame he “perished in a fire that destroyed his entire body” so no one could ask him, eh?
Yet the only reason the Germans lost was because they foolishly invaded in the winter. Size isn’t everything...
Germany could have sat comfortably behind fortifications that the hapless soviets would never have penetrated. Indeed, forcing the Russian people to invade would probably have been the end of Stalin’s regime, he really needed those Russian patriots dead, and fast!
Actually a guy named "Mueller" was head of the Gestapo. Funny coincidence...
He should fit right in, then.....
Voat is here.
No shit. Fuckin’ nazi faggots.
"If you say a lie enough times, it becomes the truth"
problem glasses check out 😁
kgb*
No threat Biden will fire Wray and if he did he would just bring Comey back.
Christian Books? Pray do tell
The bankers backed them AND the communists. They always control both sides.
If Hitler wanted to fuck globalist banker interests, he’d have invaded Switzerland and the City of London. The Soviets would have collapsed once their backers vanished.
But instead he sent millions of patriotic Germans to die in the Russian winter. The inevitable outcome of invading Russia in the winter. White genocide.
It’s possible to oppose globalism without falling into banker tyranny, which nazism certainly was. Watch and learn, nazi faggot.
New to the site and... well, taking part in politics, really, so i'm out of the loop here. What's a glowie?
''Normally used for the CIA but also used for agencies like the ATF, FBI, etc. Their inability to blend in to the native population's habits, patterns and speech makes them stick out like a sore thumb to the population, hence they "glow in the dark."
In the case of TD.win, government agents who try to pose as regular users but whose posts often include eg. calls to violence. They try to incite people to commit crimes, only to arrest them later.
What is a glowie?
''Normally used for the CIA but also used for agencies like the ATF, FBI, etc. Their inability to blend in to the native population's habits, patterns and speech makes them stick out like a sore thumb to the population, hence they "glow in the dark."
In the case of TD.win, government agents who try to pose as regular users but whose posts often include eg. calls to violence. They try to incite people to commit crimes, only to arrest them later.
tysm for this.
Reminder that Trump appointed that guy. Really makes you think don't it?
The fbi and cia are compromised. Gary Webb proved it. Who they now work for is the question. So who benefits from their actions. I would say the US has been taken over by israel. They have the FED and all major media. The people who control israel worship lucifer. Instead of becoming a peaceful multi planet species like elon talks about we are being caged in.
I don't want to feed these traitors.