I actually read all 3 pages, and my goodness, is this a long and drawn out nothing. There are a few good lines in it, but really, it says nothing of importance and rambles.
Edit: TL:DR - "Censorship is sort of bad. We delete stuff all the time, but we probably won't delete stuff because a mob demands it. We might try and tame them with love first."
“By the time you read it, you’re dead!“ Master Shake, Esq., Aqua Teen Hunger Force
I guess people are just grateful it’s not a take-down letter. Although when I saw the word “inclusion” in there, my heart skipped a beat in concern, lol.
I'm frankly Disturbed by how normal you see media bias.. it really shows how young you are that you never even lived through a time when the media was honest and reported the news.. the fact that you see it as a normal thing that the media would be pushing A narrative and distorting the truth and you think that it should be allowed because of how normal it is is disturbing for the future of Ameri
I think they carefully state their case in a way that protects them from backlash. Essentially they're saying if you ban groups or communities, you don't actually stop them from existing, and you are merely are shirking responsibility and losing the opportunity to be a positive influence.
It basically says, "Censorship is sort of bad. We delete stuff all the time, but we probably won't delete stuff because a mob demands it. We might try and tame them with love first."
You're getting downvoted but you're not wrong. The first part of the letter was good. Hidden at the end was a bunch of garbage that made me do a double take.
China was the test environment for over a decade in preparation for 2020 with WEF's The Great Reset and 2030 Agenda.
Social credit scores that restrict travel and employment are coming soon.
International organizations have masters pulling strings behind the scenes, and it's not the Chinese government despite their influence. China was selected and is a partner. Why else is western media (and their owners) not acknowledging human rights abuses and slave labor camps?
It’s the China model in reverse. In China corporations are controlled by the government. In America the government is controlled by big tech
"The notion that Big Tech has pushed for centralized control over all future narratives is very real."
I actually read all 3 pages, and my goodness, is this a long and drawn out nothing. There are a few good lines in it, but really, it says nothing of importance and rambles.
Edit: TL:DR - "Censorship is sort of bad. We delete stuff all the time, but we probably won't delete stuff because a mob demands it. We might try and tame them with love first."
“By the time you read it, you’re dead!“
Master Shake, Esq., Aqua Teen Hunger Force
I guess people are just grateful it’s not a take-down letter. Although when I saw the word “inclusion” in there, my heart skipped a beat in concern, lol.
I'm frankly Disturbed by how normal you see media bias.. it really shows how young you are that you never even lived through a time when the media was honest and reported the news.. the fact that you see it as a normal thing that the media would be pushing A narrative and distorting the truth and you think that it should be allowed because of how normal it is is disturbing for the future of Ameri
I think they carefully state their case in a way that protects them from backlash. Essentially they're saying if you ban groups or communities, you don't actually stop them from existing, and you are merely are shirking responsibility and losing the opportunity to be a positive influence.
It basically says, "Censorship is sort of bad. We delete stuff all the time, but we probably won't delete stuff because a mob demands it. We might try and tame them with love first."
You're getting downvoted but you're not wrong. The first part of the letter was good. Hidden at the end was a bunch of garbage that made me do a double take.
At this point, half a win is a win. :D
Your downvotes are weird. Maybe they didn't read it 🤔
China was the test environment for over a decade in preparation for 2020 with WEF's The Great Reset and 2030 Agenda.
Social credit scores that restrict travel and employment are coming soon.
International organizations have masters pulling strings behind the scenes, and it's not the Chinese government despite their influence. China was selected and is a partner. Why else is western media (and their owners) not acknowledging human rights abuses and slave labor camps?
The Bible refers to this partnership group as the “kings of the earth” and it does not end well for them.
Won't end well for people either. 2/3 of the population on earth will die.
Only those that don't get raptured
2/3 of the people are already marching to their own deaths.
At this point I don't think I can argue that we don't deserve it.
Agree
And who controls big tech? I see fear in Zuck's eyes.
Because big tech is controlled by China