I don't know what to really call these groups. They're building a new ideological system that has its roots in Marxism and Fascism but it isn't either of them. As to a proper description of Fascism.
Below is copy and pasted from a previous conversation I have had
Fascism is an all encompassing political and cultural ideology thought up by various Socialists who felt that the left and right wing divide were of less importance than the success of the system itself.
At its foundation is a socialist ethic combined with an ultra nationalist outlook on how the state aught to be implemented. It is largely a utilitarian ideology (although it does also combine with the spiritual and cultural identity of the state's primary ethnic group) that seeks to combine successful components of dysfunctional systems into a cohesive 3rd way/movement that is intended to transcend the concept of left and right, and transcend the state into success and superiority over competing nations.
In practice on a political compass this means that it is difficult to pin down where it is, other than being all the way up on the authoritarian spectrum, and always near the centre of left and right.
Because it is an ideology that incorporates what it needs when it needs it regardless of which wing these incorporations come from, a Fascist government will have times where its policies are more left than right or more right than left, but this nature of a Fascist system is ever changing and switching back and forth to suit the demands of the state.
The success of capitalism and its high productivity means that it is a rare day when a Fascist system will not be utilising it, albeit with strong control by the state to make sure that it serves the will of the state. And in contrast, the desire to ensure that your states people are able to serve the state and are looked after so they can serve the state will always ensure that the public sector will be run in a similar manner to how any socialist state would run it. Which is why Fascist states were the first states to implement widespread healthcare and welfare systems (prior to this only the German Empire had implemented such a thing and it was rudimentary and not that widespread).
And because of the ultra nationalist bent of such a system, these social programs will only be available for the nations primary ethnic group, or what the state perceives as being the ethnic group of the state.
So for example in China, there are many ethnic groups, with Han being primary. The other ethnic groups of China are given these programs, provided their ethnic group is not currently seen as an enemy of the State, such is the case of Tibetans and Uyghurs. And of course, foreigners cannot receive these things even if they gain citizenship.
I don't know what to really call these groups. They're building a new ideological system that has its roots in Marxism and Fascism but it isn't either of them. As to a proper description of Fascism.
Below is copy and pasted from a previous conversation I have had
Fascism is an all encompassing political and cultural ideology thought up by various Socialists who felt that the left and right wing divide were of less importance than the success of the system itself.
At its foundation is a socialist ethic combined with an ultra nationalist outlook on how the state aught to be implemented. It is largely a utilitarian ideology (although it does also combine with the spiritual and cultural identity of the state's primary ethnic group) that seeks to combine successful components of dysfunctional systems into a cohesive 3rd way/movement that is intended to transcend the concept of left and right, and transcend the state into success and superiority over competing nations.
In practice on a political compass this means that it is difficult to pin down where it is, other than being all the way up on the authoritarian spectrum, and always near the centre of left and right.
Because it is an ideology that incorporates what it needs when it needs it regardless of which wing these incorporations come from, a Fascist government will have times where its policies are more left than right or more right than left, but this nature of a Fascist system is ever changing and switching back and forth to suit the demands of the state.
The success of capitalism and its high productivity means that it is a rare day when a Fascist system will not be utilising it, albeit with strong control by the state to make sure that it serves the will of the state. And in contrast, the desire to ensure that your states people are able to serve the state and are looked after so they can serve the state will always ensure that the public sector will be run in a similar manner to how any socialist state would run it. Which is why Fascist states were the first states to implement widespread healthcare and welfare systems (prior to this only the German Empire had implemented such a thing and it was rudimentary and not that widespread).
And because of the ultra nationalist bent of such a system, these social programs will only be available for the nations primary ethnic group, or what the state perceives as being the ethnic group of the state.
So for example in China, there are many ethnic groups, with Han being primary. The other ethnic groups of China are given these programs, provided their ethnic group is not currently seen as an enemy of the State, such is the case of Tibetans and Uyghurs. And of course, foreigners cannot receive these things even if they gain citizenship.
Finished Editing.
Maybe, Globalizim