1358
Comments (66)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Numinae 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks - hadn't heard of the term. What if coordinated groups did it every 1/4 mile on a stretch - maybe 10 or 20 cars to make it appear more organic? The point isn't to haul around flags and banners but just grinding shit to a halt for MONTHS in cities? Maybe get people to move out so they lose districting?

1
Intense_peacefulness 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dont want to just shit on your plan with a wall of text so all I'm going to say is its not a good idea.

1
Numinae 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd actually be interested in hearing it; granted, that's if you want to type it... Unlike or opposition, we have, you know, jobs.

2
Intense_peacefulness 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its a lot of exposure for the drivers doing the blocking which would limit the people willing to participate. Its also pretty illegal to disrupt traffic purposefully. Not to leave out any unexpected mishaps where felonys could rack up pretty quick while using a moving vehicle as a barricade to block a public highway. I'd expect a heavy handed response from anyone in a leftist area with an opportunity to shit on people msm declares as domestic terrorists. I can only imagine. The goal of getting people to move in order to change the districts demographic seems unrealistic. People can't just move because of traffic or because they lose their jobs from being late. Its just going to piss them off really and give them one party to blame for making their shitty lives worse. With the circumstances we find ourselves in it looks like lone wolf activism and defiant acts with plausible deniability for the actors is going to be the most attractive to the majority of the base.