32
posted ago by Spez-Covfefe ago by Spez-Covfefe +32 / -0

I'm not a Q follower or person or whatever it's called, but having just watched Jones segment on it - I gotta say he makes an extremely compelling argument against it.

Basically it has its roots in the mkultra program that started in the 60s.

It was an interesting segment.

Comments (23)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
Rylan 2 points ago +2 / -0

I always thought Q was Hillary Clinton joking but some of the shit Q says "comes true" they drop tid bits of info and a massive amount of bullshit

3
Spez-Covfefe [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

The logic Jones is presenting is "why would government insiders contact anyone through 4chan or any of the other chan's"

And that government communication looks nothing like the word puzzles dropped by Q. That it's interactive fiction designed by professionals.

2
BadManOrange 2 points ago +2 / -0

I tend to agree with the logic. It seems strange and in a way, I don't get what it really accomplishes in the end. Some people say that it's to wake people up, but I think avenues such as T_D/TDW and other conservative voices have done a lot more to wake people up to what's going on than Q.