If they did invoke it, Trump would then have a space to present The Receipts for all to finally see. He could rub their faces in it. That would not be a bad thing.
lol, are you really that naive? All the evidence in the world DOESN'T MATTER. They have corrupted the system COMPLETELY. They are ideologically set against him and against freedom and anyone who supports either. You could literally have video proof of someone hacking the election and then admitting to it in person, under oath, and they literally would not care one bit. They'd even say that's evidence AGAINST the election being hacked, or simply just Russian propaganda. They are a cult, and a cult doesn't stop being a cult because you reasoned with it.
There is plenty of evidence, for instance the Navarro Report which is full of statistics that tell a tale that's hard to argue with. I may be naive, but I heard this on The War Room and it made sense to me.
I'm not a belligerent person. I don't come to forums to "call out" people who may disagree with me. Just offering a snippet that I think makes sense. I' guess I'm a dummy.
Sadly people on here still "trust in the system" and think if we just have a little more evidence, that suddenly the DOJ and courts will be on our side.
If they did invoke it, Trump would then have a space to present The Receipts for all to finally see. He could rub their faces in it. That would not be a bad thing.
lol, are you really that naive? All the evidence in the world DOESN'T MATTER. They have corrupted the system COMPLETELY. They are ideologically set against him and against freedom and anyone who supports either. You could literally have video proof of someone hacking the election and then admitting to it in person, under oath, and they literally would not care one bit. They'd even say that's evidence AGAINST the election being hacked, or simply just Russian propaganda. They are a cult, and a cult doesn't stop being a cult because you reasoned with it.
There is plenty of evidence, for instance the Navarro Report which is full of statistics that tell a tale that's hard to argue with. I may be naive, but I heard this on The War Room and it made sense to me.
I'm not a belligerent person. I don't come to forums to "call out" people who may disagree with me. Just offering a snippet that I think makes sense. I' guess I'm a dummy.
There’s mountains of evidence. But it doesn’t seem to matter anymore.
You could post receipts of wire transfers from Xi directly to election workers, and the they’d just say, “yeah that’s Russian disinformation”
Sadly people on here still "trust in the system" and think if we just have a little more evidence, that suddenly the DOJ and courts will be on our side.
Thats if they go with the impeachment