590 SCOTUS had an opportunity to weigh in on the misuse of section 230 by big tech today. They have declined to hear my case Fyk vs. Facebook. (twitter.com) posted 95 days ago by Johnkittz 95 days ago by Johnkittz +590 / -0 22 comments share 22 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (22) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 6 ▼ – crazyjackel 6 points 95 days ago +6 / -0 IMO, no one has any clue what would happen if 230 was removed. I recommend just saying that platforms are accountable for free speech according to US federal standards. permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – deleted 3 points 95 days ago +4 / -1 ▲ 4 ▼ – crazyjackel 4 points 95 days ago +4 / -0 Look, I think my solution works pretty well, you want 230 protections you should be accountable to the 1st amendment according to US federal standards. Identifying yourself as a public place of discord. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 95 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 2 ▼ – crazyjackel 2 points 95 days ago +2 / -0 It really needs an honest discussion, but it isn't ever going to get one. permalink parent save report block reply
IMO, no one has any clue what would happen if 230 was removed.
I recommend just saying that platforms are accountable for free speech according to US federal standards.
Look, I think my solution works pretty well, you want 230 protections you should be accountable to the 1st amendment according to US federal standards. Identifying yourself as a public place of discord.
It really needs an honest discussion, but it isn't ever going to get one.