590 SCOTUS had an opportunity to weigh in on the misuse of section 230 by big tech today. They have declined to hear my case Fyk vs. Facebook. (twitter.com) posted 95 days ago by Johnkittz 95 days ago by Johnkittz +590 / -0 22 comments share 22 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (22) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 1 ▼ – I_Love_45-70_Gov 1 point 94 days ago +1 / -0 Things are soooo much better with Sec 230... The original wording said they were exempt from lawsuits so let me as they did not suppress free political, religious, et al., speech. That wording was removed in committee shortly before the bill hit the floor for vote. For the life of me, I cannot find the source of this the day after reading it many, many months ago. I'll start digging again. spez: regardless, the law can be re-written to better protect avg Americans against censorship. permalink save report block reply
Things are soooo much better with Sec 230...
The original wording said they were exempt from lawsuits so let me as they did not suppress free political, religious, et al., speech.
That wording was removed in committee shortly before the bill hit the floor for vote.
For the life of me, I cannot find the source of this the day after reading it many, many months ago.
I'll start digging again.
spez: regardless, the law can be re-written to better protect avg Americans against censorship.