Most psych research (which the above falls into) paints “pedes” in a very negative light because of the major bias in psychology against conservatives. There’s a handful of articles that don’t trash conservatism, to be fair but it’s rare. But since 1) “proven” is not a term used often or correctly in science, and 2) psychology suffers from the lack of replication studies to “prove” ANYTHING times and again, much less a very conservative point, I think you’re full of it.
I'm talking about actual legit SCIENTIFIC research, not ones by pseudo ANTIFA researchers which you seem very into. Not my fault if you don't know how to do your own research.
All he is saying is that "people" of all walks of life are susceptible to disinfo, if it aligns with your subconscious hopes.
Not really: there are actual studies that show pedes are less likely to fall for disinformation and it's been proven times and times again
Most psych research (which the above falls into) paints “pedes” in a very negative light because of the major bias in psychology against conservatives. There’s a handful of articles that don’t trash conservatism, to be fair but it’s rare. But since 1) “proven” is not a term used often or correctly in science, and 2) psychology suffers from the lack of replication studies to “prove” ANYTHING times and again, much less a very conservative point, I think you’re full of it.
I'm talking about actual legit SCIENTIFIC research, not ones by pseudo ANTIFA researchers which you seem very into. Not my fault if you don't know how to do your own research.