Kicking him out of their private party is fine, banning his account on their platform is an entirely different ball field. People and organizations should have freedom of association, but banning accounts on a platform should only happen due to breaking the rules (spam, scamming, botting, threats, and other illegal activities).
A company that kicks out someone they don't like from their private party is not a free speech issue. If they allow someone they don't like to speak freely on their platform, then they are pro free speech.
Ones who don't want to be associated with Fuentes? I don't really get your point. They don't need to like the people posting, they don't need to associate themselves with them, they just need to be a platform where everyone can post anything they like as long as it is not illegal.
Kicking him out of their private party is fine, banning his account on their platform is an entirely different ball field. People and organizations should have freedom of association, but banning accounts on a platform should only happen due to breaking the rules (spam, scamming, botting, threats, and other illegal activities).
A company that kicks out someone they don't like from their private party is not a free speech issue. If they allow someone they don't like to speak freely on their platform, then they are pro free speech.
Ones who don't want to be associated with Fuentes? I don't really get your point. They don't need to like the people posting, they don't need to associate themselves with them, they just need to be a platform where everyone can post anything they like as long as it is not illegal.