977
posted ago by HighVoltage ago by HighVoltage +981 / -4

Many have said he didn't present anything that we didn't already know.

His speech was not designed to provide new evidence.

The new evidence he showed us was the vote on Capitol Hill. He showed and proved exactly who is in on the heist.

The vote on the 6th was the new evidence he presented.

Comments (63)
sorted by:
64
deleted 64 points ago +65 / -1
18
LiberatedDeathStar 18 points ago +18 / -0

I still don't know about Pence, I need more information.

I always distrusted him because he's historically a squish, but the President's statement that it would take courage to do the right thing, but even more to do nothing was a bit odd. For example, if they were going to 'Cross the Rubicon', then doing nothing cements that as their decision moving forward, while solving it via electors is backing out on going big.

15
Hunterscrackbaby 15 points ago +15 / -0

Sending electors back is the equalizing counter to the election fraud in Nov.

Crossing the Rubicon is the devastating counter punch to the election fraud in Nov.

What kind of counter puncher is Donald J Trump?

11
LiberatedDeathStar 11 points ago +11 / -0

Exactly. I have been expecting him to Cross the Rubicon for a while now.

I already knew the Senate was treasonous because of how they blocked recess appointments, so once I saw that the courts were completely messed up, I figured there was no point in 'winning' the normal way. It isn't even the most optimal way to solve the problem given the amount of corruption.

3
Two_Scoops__ 3 points ago +3 / -0

plus, the state legislators have proven to be cowards. I mean, these are people who get paid like $70k to make state level decisions, not decide the President "against" the will of the people. I say "against" because of the optics it would look like to choose Trump in the media and they know their lives would essentially be over because the Leftist mobs would destroy them and everyone they've ever talked to

2
ProphetOfKek 2 points ago +2 / -0

He’d be great if he had fists to punch with.

9
rabdargab 9 points ago +9 / -0

Think about it, whether Pence is a patriot who played the dems or is just a simp or scumbag, the fact that they steamrolled it through knowing it was credibly disputed provides the same case for Trump and the American people.

6
LiberatedDeathStar 6 points ago +6 / -0

Pretty much. The red flag to me though is that if Pence kicked it back to the legislatures of the States, then if they squish it actually becomes a legitimate election.

9
rabdargab 9 points ago +9 / -0

That was my fear with that whole plan and something that seemed very naive to me. Putting a lot of faith into state legislatures that havnt had the strongest spines thoughout this ordeal

7
LiberatedDeathStar 7 points ago +7 / -0

The Legislatures already chickened out, they didn't need the Governors to convene them, as their power is plenary. They could have met in a parking lot and did their job and it would be valid. So trusting them now wouldn't really be all that wise.

3
GBA4ever 3 points ago +3 / -0

I thought the evidence was to be presented in the electoral college vote. I read three of the states wanted to decertify their early results because of new evidence after they voted. That’s why the lax security at the capital which led to the quick vote. Seemed like a planned set up.

3
MusicToMyEars 3 points ago +3 / -0

Four states mailed Pence the desire to have more time to evaluate.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
8
LiberatedDeathStar 8 points ago +8 / -0

If Pence had objected, then the treasonous Congress could probably have just tossed out EVs for Trump, or the legislators would have caved and awarded them to Biden, which would give Constitutional 'legitimacy' to their choice.

So I lean towards Pence being compromised because that has always been my gut feeling, but I can entertain the possibility that he did as instructed.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
LiberatedDeathStar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Absolutely. I really don't know, all I know is that if they're allowing Congressional objections, that could easily have been abused if he did something. We already know they're in full blown treason, more treason won't be a deterrent.

As well for the State Legislators, there's almost certainly some compromised GOP state Congressmen. All they need is to be able to get the difference to squish and the electors are theirs, 'fair and square', since their power is plenary.

5
JediMasterPepe 5 points ago +5 / -0

tinfoil hat

The "Zero Requiem?"(Code Geass)

It would sure take a courage to destroy your face and name and sear in a burning hatred in 80+ million Americans for the sake of taking out the global cabal once and for all? 🤔

1
dookiebot 1 point ago +1 / -0

All you need to know is a fly landed on him during the debates. Same thing happened to Hillary. Same thing happened to Obama.

The fly doesn't lie.

2
yuugecrowds 2 points ago +2 / -0

He said it would take more courage to do nothing. Basically it takes a lot of courage to be outed as a pedo instead of voting to send the slates of electors back to the states.

15
deleted 15 points ago +19 / -4
9
DonJr2032 9 points ago +11 / -2

It's easy to believe that, but one has to acknowledge that this might not be the case based on several things:

  • Trump delayed his speech until the moment when Pence sent out his announcement
  • Trump & Pence have always been 100% on the same page
  • He said twice in his speech that the real courage is to do nothing
  • A myriad of other evidence that things are happening in the background
  • BLM radical activist confirmed in the room with the woman that was shot
  • Someone with the authority filming an obviously staged storming up the stairs event.
  • Police opening the doors and greeting everyone as they calmly walk into the Capitol

I'm not saying there is something planned and the 6th was part of it, but one can't rule this out yet.

12
Poneegryl 12 points ago +13 / -1

Mind=blown. Dude. DUDE!

4
CovefefeREEEE 4 points ago +4 / -0

Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude.

3
dookiebot 3 points ago +3 / -0

And Dudettes.

10
free4me 10 points ago +10 / -0

It was never about the 6th. And it's not even about the 20th. It's about coordinated election fraud and paid for interference. It's global. It's explosive. It's over for the USA if we let this pass. And they are blocking every media outlet, every patriot and the President of the United States. They believe this is enough. But, shit, it's all so evil, how can it be? Praying for light and for truth. No matter what that looks like, it's better than building our future on lies.

8
Camarokirk 8 points ago +9 / -1

That and I think the red file shown on video was a hot file for military action. He was getting the hard drives and laptops in a covert action. I wish somebody here could find the videos where those might of been stored and stolen. I've heard of people leaving quickly after breech with wrapped up something...

8
HillarysHairyAss 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yes, that video was interesting. He wanted that folder to be seen. The video also proves that he was in the tent the whole time, so he delayed his speech for an hour on purpose.

1
Wanderlust 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why'd he do that again? I vaguely remember someone it made plans for infiltrating our march harder. But I don't quite recall.

2
HillarysHairyAss 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t know the reason, just thought that it was interesting that he was there. They were all singing happy birthday to Don Jr in the tent and the camera panned and POTUS was holding up the folder, seemingly so that the camera would catch it. I don’t know about the timing of the video, but it think it was when the crowd was singing happy birthday while Jr was at the mic.

2
Wanderlust 2 points ago +2 / -0

All good. I do remember the clip. He did not try to hide that red folder at all.

1
Hoosierdaddy 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was Eric Trumps bday, not Don Jr's.

1
HillarysHairyAss 1 point ago +1 / -0

My bad... thanks for clarifying.

1
Maconstate 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait. What? ELI5

1
Captainzoomer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Link?!?

1
Here_we_go 1 point ago +1 / -0

Red file?

3
Camarokirk 3 points ago +4 / -1

There is a video not sure by who...but it's backstage saying happy birthday to JR. Ivanka is on there. They pan the tent....and first shot Trump is facing away from the camera...as it pans back Trump is holding a red file way up....and is facing the camera. Tell me that didn't mean something

7
badsector 7 points ago +9 / -2

Get off of the hopium... Trump doesn't beat around the bush or ask you to guess what he's really trying to say... that's why all of us love him so much, he's a straight shooter and says what he means. Nothing to see here.

0
You_Aint_Black 0 points ago +1 / -1

he's a straight shooter

I have yet to see him shoot anyone... I am a skeptic.

0
Maconstate 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yeah I can’t think of any other time something cryptic has ever come true. We’re 0/1000 with these hopium guesses

7
Dragofireheart 7 points ago +8 / -1

Bingo

6
Tommyjoe2 6 points ago +9 / -3

Crazy mental gymnastics here. 10/10

4
Jimmy_Russler 4 points ago +6 / -2

These guys are going to end up convincing themselves that Xiden getting into office was part of the plan "in order to complete the steal" or something. Can we pls deport all the Qfags past Jan 20th if Trump leaves office?

2
You_Aint_Black 2 points ago +4 / -2

Dude it’s to get Sessions more incriminating info on them. What better strategy than to let them access the most powerful levers of control in the entire Western Hemisphere for the next four years while Sessions plays his cards on the down low?

Genius... pure. Genius.

6
JonathanE 6 points ago +7 / -1

Apparently information was provided to senators before the vote, probably to ensure that charges of fraud would stick easier

5
Marble68 5 points ago +5 / -0

I was watching a speech before him, and the guy said the dominion system was connected to the internet so it could produce digital "adjudicated" ballots for people on the voter roles who had not voted yes.

He said, it had ballots in a folder, ready to use, and it'd just pull them out for voters who did not vote.

Does anyone else remember that?

4
Cakes4077 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yep, that was Professor Eastman, a constitutional lawyer, up there with Rudy.

5
minotaurbeach 5 points ago +5 / -0

And he delivered.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
JohnCocktoastin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also easy to interpret "doing nothing" as requiring courage because you'd knowingly be certifying horse shit and doing it with full knowledge of what Trump has on it. That would take some courage and balls to do.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
JoRoMa319 1 point ago +1 / -0

Very good point. I have been wondering why his rally speech was basically everything most of us knew already

1
DrinkTeaNotKoolaid 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting perspective. Trump didn’t provide any new info for those paying close attention. I figured he was presenting to those who weren’t ie the Senate

3
NordicIsrael 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trymp didn't provide it; he generated it!

1
Financial_mom 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think that was one part of it. The other was to let everyone know how much support there is to fight this rigged election.

1
deleted 1 point ago +9 / -8
3
Cross_The_Rubicon 3 points ago +4 / -1

At this point grasping at invisible straws it seems

1
KYMAGApatriot1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe I’m a Pollyanna, but with everyone, including vast majority of Republicans and VP Pence selling him out, and with Pelosi, Schumer and the rest of their dirty posse trying to push through impeachment to prevent Trump from ever returning again, I can’t believe Trump, who fights like a pit bull and has no problem calling out people on National tv will quit with his tail tucked between his legs.

1
TrumpWin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am still confused by by his speech tho. What was the speech meant to say.

0
Beay 0 points ago +1 / -1

So are we all to die of heart failure WAITING???

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4