977
posted ago by HighVoltage ago by HighVoltage +981 / -4

Many have said he didn't present anything that we didn't already know.

His speech was not designed to provide new evidence.

The new evidence he showed us was the vote on Capitol Hill. He showed and proved exactly who is in on the heist.

The vote on the 6th was the new evidence he presented.

Comments (63)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
18
LiberatedDeathStar 18 points ago +18 / -0

I still don't know about Pence, I need more information.

I always distrusted him because he's historically a squish, but the President's statement that it would take courage to do the right thing, but even more to do nothing was a bit odd. For example, if they were going to 'Cross the Rubicon', then doing nothing cements that as their decision moving forward, while solving it via electors is backing out on going big.

15
Hunterscrackbaby 15 points ago +15 / -0

Sending electors back is the equalizing counter to the election fraud in Nov.

Crossing the Rubicon is the devastating counter punch to the election fraud in Nov.

What kind of counter puncher is Donald J Trump?

11
LiberatedDeathStar 11 points ago +11 / -0

Exactly. I have been expecting him to Cross the Rubicon for a while now.

I already knew the Senate was treasonous because of how they blocked recess appointments, so once I saw that the courts were completely messed up, I figured there was no point in 'winning' the normal way. It isn't even the most optimal way to solve the problem given the amount of corruption.

3
Two_Scoops__ 3 points ago +3 / -0

plus, the state legislators have proven to be cowards. I mean, these are people who get paid like $70k to make state level decisions, not decide the President "against" the will of the people. I say "against" because of the optics it would look like to choose Trump in the media and they know their lives would essentially be over because the Leftist mobs would destroy them and everyone they've ever talked to

2
ProphetOfKek 2 points ago +2 / -0

He’d be great if he had fists to punch with.

9
rabdargab 9 points ago +9 / -0

Think about it, whether Pence is a patriot who played the dems or is just a simp or scumbag, the fact that they steamrolled it through knowing it was credibly disputed provides the same case for Trump and the American people.

6
LiberatedDeathStar 6 points ago +6 / -0

Pretty much. The red flag to me though is that if Pence kicked it back to the legislatures of the States, then if they squish it actually becomes a legitimate election.

9
rabdargab 9 points ago +9 / -0

That was my fear with that whole plan and something that seemed very naive to me. Putting a lot of faith into state legislatures that havnt had the strongest spines thoughout this ordeal

7
LiberatedDeathStar 7 points ago +7 / -0

The Legislatures already chickened out, they didn't need the Governors to convene them, as their power is plenary. They could have met in a parking lot and did their job and it would be valid. So trusting them now wouldn't really be all that wise.

3
GBA4ever 3 points ago +3 / -0

I thought the evidence was to be presented in the electoral college vote. I read three of the states wanted to decertify their early results because of new evidence after they voted. That’s why the lax security at the capital which led to the quick vote. Seemed like a planned set up.

3
MusicToMyEars 3 points ago +3 / -0

Four states mailed Pence the desire to have more time to evaluate.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
8
LiberatedDeathStar 8 points ago +8 / -0

If Pence had objected, then the treasonous Congress could probably have just tossed out EVs for Trump, or the legislators would have caved and awarded them to Biden, which would give Constitutional 'legitimacy' to their choice.

So I lean towards Pence being compromised because that has always been my gut feeling, but I can entertain the possibility that he did as instructed.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
LiberatedDeathStar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Absolutely. I really don't know, all I know is that if they're allowing Congressional objections, that could easily have been abused if he did something. We already know they're in full blown treason, more treason won't be a deterrent.

As well for the State Legislators, there's almost certainly some compromised GOP state Congressmen. All they need is to be able to get the difference to squish and the electors are theirs, 'fair and square', since their power is plenary.

5
JediMasterPepe 5 points ago +5 / -0

tinfoil hat

The "Zero Requiem?"(Code Geass)

It would sure take a courage to destroy your face and name and sear in a burning hatred in 80+ million Americans for the sake of taking out the global cabal once and for all? 🤔

1
dookiebot 1 point ago +1 / -0

All you need to know is a fly landed on him during the debates. Same thing happened to Hillary. Same thing happened to Obama.

The fly doesn't lie.