Many have said he didn't present anything that we didn't already know.
His speech was not designed to provide new evidence.
The new evidence he showed us was the vote on Capitol Hill. He showed and proved exactly who is in on the heist.
The vote on the 6th was the new evidence he presented.
Exactly. I have been expecting him to Cross the Rubicon for a while now.
I already knew the Senate was treasonous because of how they blocked recess appointments, so once I saw that the courts were completely messed up, I figured there was no point in 'winning' the normal way. It isn't even the most optimal way to solve the problem given the amount of corruption.