977
posted ago by HighVoltage ago by HighVoltage +981 / -4

Many have said he didn't present anything that we didn't already know.

His speech was not designed to provide new evidence.

The new evidence he showed us was the vote on Capitol Hill. He showed and proved exactly who is in on the heist.

The vote on the 6th was the new evidence he presented.

Comments (63)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
9
rabdargab 9 points ago +9 / -0

Think about it, whether Pence is a patriot who played the dems or is just a simp or scumbag, the fact that they steamrolled it through knowing it was credibly disputed provides the same case for Trump and the American people.

6
LiberatedDeathStar 6 points ago +6 / -0

Pretty much. The red flag to me though is that if Pence kicked it back to the legislatures of the States, then if they squish it actually becomes a legitimate election.

9
rabdargab 9 points ago +9 / -0

That was my fear with that whole plan and something that seemed very naive to me. Putting a lot of faith into state legislatures that havnt had the strongest spines thoughout this ordeal

7
LiberatedDeathStar 7 points ago +7 / -0

The Legislatures already chickened out, they didn't need the Governors to convene them, as their power is plenary. They could have met in a parking lot and did their job and it would be valid. So trusting them now wouldn't really be all that wise.

3
GBA4ever 3 points ago +3 / -0

I thought the evidence was to be presented in the electoral college vote. I read three of the states wanted to decertify their early results because of new evidence after they voted. That’s why the lax security at the capital which led to the quick vote. Seemed like a planned set up.

3
MusicToMyEars 3 points ago +3 / -0

Four states mailed Pence the desire to have more time to evaluate.