Many have said he didn't present anything that we didn't already know.
His speech was not designed to provide new evidence.
The new evidence he showed us was the vote on Capitol Hill. He showed and proved exactly who is in on the heist.
The vote on the 6th was the new evidence he presented.
It's easy to believe that, but one has to acknowledge that this might not be the case based on several things:
I'm not saying there is something planned and the 6th was part of it, but one can't rule this out yet.