I don't need to, I own my own server, and it's colocated in a real datacenter ;) Trust me man, most people that even give it a shot have trouble getting simple port forwarding setup without explicit instructions, let alone debugging things when they go wrong. Hell, the average person doesn't even know the difference between a router and modem. There is basically no way to do this in such a way that a novice could do it due to the endless variety of hardware and setups. With that said, something like a local application that uses a server initiated websocket to connect would be feasible. It basically has to be point and click for the average person and 99% are technically inept.
"and it's colocated in a real datacenter" You mean it's in a Silicon Valley server farm? lol "The cloud"??? I hope not.
"Trust me man," Yeaaaa, I'll start bringing awareness to the countless thousands of people who already operate their own servers (actual hardware servers, that belong to them personally) to stop, because it's too difficult. Thanks for clarifying this! Thank kek for suppression trolling! xD
No man, like actually in a datacenter that I have physically have access to, and yes I own the hardware. I'm an engineer, so I have some idea of what I'm talking about. You vastly overestimate the technical competency of the average person. A few thousand is not sufficient, it would have to be in the millions to make an impact.
"in a datacenter that I have physically have access to, and yes I own the hardware." Better.
"I'm an engineer, so I have some idea of what I'm talking about. You vastly overestimate the technical competency..." MBA, MIT, project management focus, doctoral studies. It can be done. I don't want to hear about 'can't'. If we only built things previously demonstrated, there would be no progress at all. Stubborn 'can't' isn't a realistic outlook. Find solutions.
"MBA, ..., project management focus" ah now I understand your opinion, you don't know what you're talking about, but know what a deadline is haha. Look, you're confusing the problem with the solution. Yes the problem needs to be solved, but your solution isn't feasible. It's not a "can't" attitude, it's a "it doesn't work regardless of wishful thinking" attitude. You're succumbing to the positive portion of the Dunning-Kruger effect; you are able to do it, and thus inadvertently presume that others are able to as well. But, let's face it, we're having the same argument that SWEs and project managers have had since the beginning of software engineering.
I don't need to, I own my own server, and it's colocated in a real datacenter ;) Trust me man, most people that even give it a shot have trouble getting simple port forwarding setup without explicit instructions, let alone debugging things when they go wrong. Hell, the average person doesn't even know the difference between a router and modem. There is basically no way to do this in such a way that a novice could do it due to the endless variety of hardware and setups. With that said, something like a local application that uses a server initiated websocket to connect would be feasible. It basically has to be point and click for the average person and 99% are technically inept.
"and it's colocated in a real datacenter" You mean it's in a Silicon Valley server farm? lol "The cloud"??? I hope not.
"Trust me man," Yeaaaa, I'll start bringing awareness to the countless thousands of people who already operate their own servers (actual hardware servers, that belong to them personally) to stop, because it's too difficult. Thanks for clarifying this! Thank kek for suppression trolling! xD
No man, like actually in a datacenter that I have physically have access to, and yes I own the hardware. I'm an engineer, so I have some idea of what I'm talking about. You vastly overestimate the technical competency of the average person. A few thousand is not sufficient, it would have to be in the millions to make an impact.
"in a datacenter that I have physically have access to, and yes I own the hardware." Better.
"I'm an engineer, so I have some idea of what I'm talking about. You vastly overestimate the technical competency..." MBA, MIT, project management focus, doctoral studies. It can be done. I don't want to hear about 'can't'. If we only built things previously demonstrated, there would be no progress at all. Stubborn 'can't' isn't a realistic outlook. Find solutions.
"MBA, ..., project management focus" ah now I understand your opinion, you don't know what you're talking about, but know what a deadline is haha. Look, you're confusing the problem with the solution. Yes the problem needs to be solved, but your solution isn't feasible. It's not a "can't" attitude, it's a "it doesn't work regardless of wishful thinking" attitude. You're succumbing to the positive portion of the Dunning-Kruger effect; you are able to do it, and thus inadvertently presume that others are able to as well. But, let's face it, we're having the same argument that SWEs and project managers have had since the beginning of software engineering.