8461
Comments (532)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
0
randomusers239874 0 points ago +1 / -1

No man, like actually in a datacenter that I have physically have access to, and yes I own the hardware. I'm an engineer, so I have some idea of what I'm talking about. You vastly overestimate the technical competency of the average person. A few thousand is not sufficient, it would have to be in the millions to make an impact.

1
Dr0neRec0very 1 point ago +1 / -0

"in a datacenter that I have physically have access to, and yes I own the hardware." Better.

"I'm an engineer, so I have some idea of what I'm talking about. You vastly overestimate the technical competency..." MBA, MIT, project management focus, doctoral studies. It can be done. I don't want to hear about 'can't'. If we only built things previously demonstrated, there would be no progress at all. Stubborn 'can't' isn't a realistic outlook. Find solutions.

0
randomusers239874 0 points ago +1 / -1

"MBA, ..., project management focus" ah now I understand your opinion, you don't know what you're talking about, but know what a deadline is haha. Look, you're confusing the problem with the solution. Yes the problem needs to be solved, but your solution isn't feasible. It's not a "can't" attitude, it's a "it doesn't work regardless of wishful thinking" attitude. You're succumbing to the positive portion of the Dunning-Kruger effect; you are able to do it, and thus inadvertently presume that others are able to as well. But, let's face it, we're having the same argument that SWEs and project managers have had since the beginning of software engineering.

1
Dr0neRec0very 1 point ago +1 / -0

"you don't know what you're talking about" If you really were an engineer and not just a suppression troll faggot, you'd find solutions instead of talking about things you "don't" or "can't". Go eat a bag of dicks.