TO ALL MORONS: The Insurrection Act was SIGNED in 1807 by THOMAS JEFFERSON, ignorant fucks. Trump can INVOKE the act, NOT FUCKING SIGN IT!!!! Stop being retards or GTFO!
(media.thedonald.win)
posted ago by LevonRiver
+712 / -6
Comments (41)
sorted by:
"sign" can signify more than just the original signature.* It can also refer to the signing done once again in order to enact it. You sound exactly like your avatar.
you out-of-control self-important #@&$!
Thank you for your confession that you don't know the difference between an ACT OF LAW and an ORDER implementing any such law. My message was correctly addressed to you. Pro tip: Wear a bib if you try to feed yourself.
Yeah, but he still wouldnt be signing the ACT of Congress.
I agree with you OP. Too many tards who are just repeating stuff other people say without even thinking about it.
Giving an order to invoke the insurrection act is signing it.
Only to a mouth-breathing knuckle-dragging short-bus-window-licking inbred twit.
So you?
No, no it's not. The act, which is a document sent from Congress to the White House, doesn't need to be dredged up from the national archives to be signed by every President that wants to invoke it.
Correct, but an order to do something, citing it, is.
In order to invoke it he needs to apply his signature to it to authenticate it. He would technically be signing a document to invoke the insurrection act. You are arguing semantics.
No, you Alfred-Korzybski-dick-sucking illiterate fuck. I am talking about WORDS that have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT MEANINGS.
Just because you're too propagandized and brainwashed to understand that an ACT OF LAW is COMPLETELY different from an EXECUTIVE ORDER doesn't mean that the rest of the world is as butt-plug ignorant as you.
Lol you must be very popular at parties.
Calm down Francis.
I want to upboot more! LMAO
This is nothing to get worked over.
Nobody thinks what you're saying.
Oh, here's another candidate for a padded room who hallucinates that he speaks for everybody. FOAD, Delusion Boi.
Trump can sign anything he wants to sign, so fuck off. = )
Would be cool if he stole the original Declaration of Independence so he could sign it bigger than Hancock.
but did he sign it yet tho?
Lmao🐸👌
RAGE!!!!
Its time for Sargent Hulka with the big toe to go on over and see how far he can shove it up ur ass
How about you bring him over.
Jeez. Give it a rest. Fact checking and calling folks morons is so SJW.
Not to mention that it has to be signed by him to go into affect. OP is not too bright.
Two more short-bus riders who have no idea that an EXECUTIVE ORDER is completely different from an ACT OF LEGISLATION.
Go eat your fucking Fruit Loops.
But he DOES have to sign it into evocation. You know that, right? Stop name calling like a Lefty. Your post is trash and is wrong.
You keep intentionally using the vague pronoun "it" (assuming you know what a pronoun is, which is a stretch), while carefully avoiding saying what "it" is.
Here's a clue, clueless: "It" IS NOT the ACT. So if you're among the crowd of morons calling for him to SIGH THE INSURRECTION ACT, congratulations: You're the Head Moron.
An ORDER is not an ACT, and a BUFFALO is not a HOUSE. If you want to argue that inarguable fact, get the fuck out of MY face, or I will send you straight to the Twit File.
Give them a fuckin break
No signature required? Easy.
Harsh
I think they would need something writing, as he could just say - "I said no such thing, Mike??"
Of course there would have to be an ORDER in writing. But go ahead and beat the stuffing out of your straw man some more.
Jeez. Give it a rest. Fact checking and calling folks morons is so SJW.
Well, invoking it would require a signing of its invocation.
And an ORDER OF INVOCATION is NOT the fucking LEGISLATIVE ACT. Get off mommy's computer.
No. She lets me use it between her OnlyFans sessions.
actually its pompeo that invokes" it. reeeeeeeeeeeeee