6268
Comments (250)
sorted by:
293
VP_Unchained 293 points ago +293 / -0

I heard an interview with Jason. He explained it all extremely well. Too bad SCOTUS has sold America out

201
ChuckedBeef 201 points ago +201 / -0

SCOTUS are cowards and frauds. The whole system has been gamed and needs to be reset.

48
RiverRunnerVDB 48 points ago +48 / -0

They have destroyed all but one box of Liberty. And they’re giving that one the hairy eyeball too. How far will they push us before we say “enough!”?

13
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 13 points ago +13 / -0

As far as we let them.

3
amarQ144 3 points ago +3 / -0

We will say "enough" over and over again, ever hoping the evil commie pedocrat bastards some how some day just all just all at once do the right thing. Only the left is violent and actually does anything more than say enough...ya kno wat i mean? The "right" are all "law and order"...moral high ground and all that. Pure insanity.

3
Stable_Genius84 3 points ago +3 / -0

As far as they want because they control the media. They scorch us on the MSM, social media, and everywhere in between. Because we're morally decent people who love America, their guilt they project our way will always be out demise.

20
Sticky 20 points ago +20 / -0

We can’t fix the system through the broken system any longer so what do we do?

17
GenerallyRight 17 points ago +17 / -0

The best suggestion I have heard is the convention of states. That has problems, too, but it's all I have.

2
side_o_beef 2 points ago +4 / -2

Infiltration. Become fake democrats, take over their party. If there's tons of us working all kinds of local positions, ballot dumps stop working. Dominion machines suddenly break all the time. Etc.

2
HanginChad 2 points ago +2 / -0

I might take my small claims dispute to the SCOTUS. Maybe that's something that can handle.

95
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 95 points ago +95 / -0

The entire government is corrupt. They are truly the enemy of the free people of this world. Trump figured this out long ago and gave up his amazing life to try and save humanity.

Reconcile.

36
Itateeverybody 36 points ago +36 / -0

Except the 3 Trump appointees declined to hear Texas' suit. Fucking Bush appointees were the only ones to see what was actually at stake...

32
2Legit2Quit 32 points ago +32 / -0

And not just any single Bush - both damn Bush appointees. Fuk!

And FTR, I don't consider any of the Trump judges to be Trump's, rather McConnell judges.

35
Itateeverybody 35 points ago +35 / -0

Right? What a fucking own goal. To think how happy we were at the time they were pushing these judges through.

If you wrote about the level of betrayal as a script for a movie the producers would say it's unrealistic for these many people to turn on a person at once.

11
MrWinMan 11 points ago +11 / -0

We should've known when he was so eager to seat Amy Coney Barrett

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
JustHereForTheSalmon 6 points ago +6 / -0

There was a huge backlash here if anyone suggested Judge Legoa as a better pick. But we were right, he clearly listened to the wrong people.

2
MAGA_MEXICAN_CHILI 2 points ago +2 / -0

it wasnt that he listened to the wrong people. Trump was given zero outs by McConnell... That bitch...whats her name oh Ann Coulter told conservatives to back Mitch in 2014, right when we were going to throw him out for being an ineffective minority leader.

Had we gotten rid of that snake in 2014 maybe things would have rolled slightly different for Trump in 2016.

4
Frog_Anne 4 points ago +4 / -0

Maybe it was quid pro quo. They only put up token resistance to ACB, knowing Roberts is in their pocket anyway, and in exchange the Repubs look the other way when they commit massive fraud and steal the presidency. Win-win for those people anyway, because Trump was fouling up their gravy train.

10
Hokage_Trump 10 points ago +10 / -0

McConnell

McCocaine Mitch. With Biden his supplier.

4
NYpatrol123 4 points ago +4 / -0

I truly hope John Roberts is exposed and arrested

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 1 point ago +1 / -0

Reread what I wrote.

31
Comanche_Moon 31 points ago +32 / -1

We need Jesus to throw the money lenders out of all of our temples, and if Jesus isn't available, his partner, Donald Trump, is more than capable of doing it.

14
Rocks_vs_Uzis 14 points ago +16 / -2

We don't need this government anymore. We need to separate ourselves from this system entirely and build our own networks town by town. This is a golden opportunity to build a parallel system and slowly gain independence from the old system. This government is pushing us away and we keep clinging to it foolishly, let them go! Go where you're welcomed!

10
JackDorseyForPrison 10 points ago +10 / -0

It's really shameful how useless they've been for the past two months. The cabal must have some pretty damning blackmail material on them. That's the only reasonable explanation at this point.

8
VP_Unchained 8 points ago +8 / -0

Something is up. Just got a text from a truck driver friend. Gas up your vehicles and have cash on hand, food, etc.
Then, I just read this on Populist.Press National guard activated and streaming into DC. 6200 due by end of the week. https://populist.press/busloads-just-arrived-in-washington-dc/

2
NYpatrol123 2 points ago +2 / -0

Digging out my generator in the morning and filling all my gas cans and cars. Prepped on food, dog & cat food and water already. Other important things ready. Baofang Hand Held Ham radios on order. Digging out CB radio 🇺🇸

2
BraydenB 2 points ago +2 / -0

Supply chain issues in our future?

2
VP_Unchained 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only if you're near DC. IT'S Probably going to be a little mobility restricted there for a while. Possibly around state capitols too. Looks like they may be expecting those miscreant ruffians who want to prevent the President elects inauguration. Of course, I'm just guessing. What do you think?

152
happy_nationalist 152 points ago +153 / -1

It's all corrupt! Hence, the military is needed to take it over and restart it.

98
oshead 98 points ago +99 / -1

The only way the military option would work is if the generals were replace by Trump by some based pedes. The top brass are all cucked too.

66
Thep1mp 66 points ago +66 / -0

Look at past military takeovers. It’s generally Colonels and lower- the General’s often are the first to get fragged

46
hloblart 46 points ago +48 / -2

Bad career move to, Gaddafi was stuck in a dead end colonel job for 42 years afterward.

29
Trump2024 29 points ago +29 / -0

Whatever job he has now must REALLY be a dead end. You never hear anything about him now.

7
Aoikaze2000 7 points ago +7 / -0

rimshot

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
SpaceTiger 11 points ago +11 / -0

And in the end, he got sodomized by, what, knives, and Hillary laughed over it.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
Chinese_spy2 3 points ago +3 / -0

That is quite a hilarious comment. Very witty.

6
oshead 6 points ago +6 / -0

Well, that would probably have to happen.

29
Uncle_Jose 29 points ago +29 / -0

The only way the military option would work is if the generals were replace by Trump by some based pedes. The top brass are all cucked too.

Yup, I mean they lied directly to the Commander In Chief to keep troops in the middle east, directly disobeying orders to pull them out. And then laughed while talking about it.

23
jc99ta 23 points ago +23 / -0

And no one was punished

6
Scipio_Americanus 6 points ago +7 / -1

Don't worry, they haven't been forgotten by those who will do something about it.

5
FutureMan 5 points ago +6 / -1

Us?

-6
thehacker4channel -6 points ago +3 / -9

Uh, no. We would get fucking exterminated in a war. Maybe he means the god that abandoned all Americans on November 3rd.

5
TuckerCarlsonsTie 5 points ago +6 / -1

Really? Afghanistan, Vietnam, NOKO, and Colonial America has entered the chat

1
side_o_beef 1 point ago +2 / -1

Most grunts are just people from our own neighborhood. Who's going to be doing the exterminating when they all say "fuck this I'm out"?

8
Rocks_vs_Uzis 8 points ago +8 / -0

We need to build a government in exile and abandon this one. It's been fully taken over by hostiles. It would require far too much effort and time to get back so we need to focus on building our own parallel systems and make this current government along with its oligarch economy obsolete. We must disassociate and separate from these people or we will drown in the same tumultuous waters as they sail the ship of state onto the rocks.

1
NYpatrol123 1 point ago +1 / -0

He who has the nuke codes is in Power

6
Goldlight 6 points ago +6 / -0

didn't trump change military general after nov 4?

4
Uncle_Jose 4 points ago +4 / -0

He replaced the Secretary Of Defense a few days after that.

2
Goldlight 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ok, I remember there being more though but idk

2
Uncle_Jose 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah he's replaced a few people since then, don't remember names of others though.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
0
NYpatrol123 0 points ago +1 / -1

His arrest is coming soon

11
0io- 11 points ago +11 / -0

A couple of guys with a rope could solve the problem out in the Wild West.

4
Drcm 4 points ago +5 / -1

That statement is kind of broken. Govt is corrupt so you want a more totalitarian govt to fix it? That's sounds like lefty logic where more govt is always the answer.

Hoping for the army is not the play

5
Rocks_vs_Uzis 5 points ago +5 / -0

Glad someone gets it. We need a new government that's separate from the one we currently have. They will call it illegitimate and we won't care. Parallel systems, cryptos and shadow banking networks are in our future. To hell with the oligarchs and the fascists!

3
Moniie 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s all corrupt!......including the military

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
110
MAGA1775 110 points ago +112 / -2

Remember the days when people would post based MAGA memes with SCOTUS pictures?

Who knew that McConnell suggested judges would be so corrupt

80
halcyondream 80 points ago +80 / -0

We needed 5 Scalia's but instead they murdered the only one we had.

16
Rocks_vs_Uzis 16 points ago +16 / -0

We need a separate government that has nothing to do with the one we currently have. We're holding onto and fighting over a rotting corpse. Countries come and go but a nation is its people. We can make a new constitutional federation even more easily than the colonials did because we have easy access to all information and the entire library of the human race. If we can't build a new country in hostile territory we will never conquer outer space. Our species was never meant to stay here. We need to learn how to build small effective systems of governance that is easily scalable in order to handle wider societal issues or we go extinct fighting on this rock over scraps. We have to stop thinking so small.

-20
deleted -20 points ago +3 / -23
56
generated_name 56 points ago +56 / -0

Who knew that McConnell suggested judges would be so corrupt

Robert Barnes. He's been saying it for a long time now.

He predicted ACB wouldn't help Trump, predicted SCOTUS wouldn't help Trump, predicted "Trump" (read: McConnell) Judges would not hear any cases, and predicted Pence would be weak and not do what he could.

29
MAGA1775 29 points ago +31 / -2

I've been following Barnes and noticed that too. I shared that on here but was called a doomer shill and it seemed like everyone hated Barnes, calling him an idiot and doomer.

23
generated_name 23 points ago +23 / -0

Yeah, I ran into that also.

This would be a much different site if people had been listening to Barnes and not Lin Wood.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
7
Specter 7 points ago +7 / -0

I was guilty of that. Barnes has been vindicated 100 times over

2
Rocks_vs_Uzis 2 points ago +4 / -2

Maybe the problem is that our form of government is obsolete. We're so used to this system that it never occurred to us that it's actually deeply flawed. We're seeing it right now. We need to learn from our mistakes, abandon this system and try a new scalable federated system. This isn't working anymore, it's causing people strife.

2
side_o_beef 2 points ago +2 / -0

Our system isn't federated anymore. The beast at the top invents cash out of nothing and all the "states" are bitches that have to go along with it because commerce and welfare clause.

We started with a good thing and it got fucked up over time.

1
generated_name 1 point ago +1 / -0

Our system as it was created is perfectly fine and scalable, with maybe a few changes. The problem is that system has been altered in so many different ways now that it isn't what people think it is.

Just for example: senators used to be chosen by state legislature. That kept them more accountable and kept their terms short. It meant they were harder to buy off by big corporations because they were just going to be gone soon anyway (a lot of times in less than there full term). After that was changed, via constitutional amendment, was when we started seeing senators staying in for 20+ years. They never have to see the people who voted for them, and they aren't accountable to their states ruling body. Graham or McConnell couldn't exist in the old system.

22
wartooth6 22 points ago +22 / -0

If there's one thing to take away from the last couple months is the lengths career politicians will go if you so much challenge their authority.

12
FutureMan 12 points ago +12 / -0

I was hoping Kavanaugh learnt his lesson well enough to be an asset, but I guess not. I'm shocked how quickly they turned on the people though. I guess the USA really is gone, now its the 4 mega-corporation land.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
side_o_beef 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seems to be the way of D.C. Every xir for ximself.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
1
rplgn 1 point ago +1 / -0

MAGA version 2.0

78
PropagandaWizard1984 78 points ago +78 / -0

SCOTUS is the most useless thing ever! SCOTUS is the Deep State.

-41
deleted -41 points ago +4 / -45
24
mainsoda 24 points ago +24 / -0

Anyone that can look at the big tech takeover of our society and do nothing is obviously deep state.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
BigHandsome91 2 points ago +2 / -0

Government approved free market*

FTFY

10
WhitePowerRanger 10 points ago +10 / -0

At this point, anyone who disagrees with FREEDOM is deep state. Freedom is no delusion. Fuck outta here

4
TheWinningNeverStops 4 points ago +4 / -0

Name checks out.

2
PropagandaWizard1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unironically yes.

55
SteelMongoose 55 points ago +58 / -3

The Supreme Court is also making the case that the Constitution is no longer in effect and that the court has no remaining authority.

4
memechallenger33 4 points ago +4 / -0

I never thought that confirming judges who are not activist judges meant that we were actually installing dead bodies incapable of motion.

2
side_o_beef 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mentally, they're older than the document their court is based on. No energy left.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
17
SteelMongoose 17 points ago +17 / -0

By failing to address the concerns in this election, the Supreme Court is allowing violations of the 1st and 2nd articles and the 1st, 10th, and 14th amendments of the Constitution (off the top of my head) Whether their reasons for refusing to hear these cases are rooted in cowardice or complicity, the result is to allow election fraud to change results in the face of statistical impossibilities and numerous procedural illegalities.

No Constitution means no law, of any kind. Toss the 10th Amendment, for example, and you've tossed the basis for all local law enforcement of criminal and civil law. To make matters worse, they cowered while the most conspicuous possible matter, a presidential election, was being considered. Now at least 75 million (and probably quite a few more) voters realize that there is an authority that will select candidates when they don't like what the voters have to say.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
8
SteelMongoose 8 points ago +8 / -0

There was no conclusion. There was no presentation or examination of evidence. There was only abdication of responsibility. Mathematical analysis alone is enough to demonstrate that vote counts are off. Deeper dives into the math make the question laughable. That's before you get into legal issues, one of which the Supremes Court flagged for observation (in Pennsylvania) before the election.

At the very least, anyone who doesn't understand math and doesn't find it odd that ballot dumps occurred in four cities simultaneously without observers and when the counting was supposedly paused (more statistical impossibilities in those ratios, by the way) should be eager to lay the matter to rest with transparent analysis, no?

Strangely, no one on the Left has argued for this. Instead, they have argued against allowing evidence and processes to be examined. If you think the evidence backs your claim, you welcome analysis. You don't destroy evidence and refuse court orders if you think you won honestly.

If Trump has won in this way, your "different political viewpoint" would have you howling for transparency. The difference is that I would be standing beside you, because I value the Constitution and truth more than I value the results of any particular election.

Very few people will benefit from the post-Constitutional era we seem to be entering. There are a fair number of people who have been moved to unfocused hatred by the same slanted media that has refused to report on the laughably fraud in this election, but there is nothing for them in our glorious new globalist technocracy.

I suspect that fewer still will recognize how they participated in bringing it about, either.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
side_o_beef 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a very obvious thing. They looked at no evidence; they didn't hear a case. If they had heard the case and ruled against it, I could at least respect their backbone and corruption because that's directly standing up to the entire conservative population in the US. Instead, they were cowards, citing concerns over unrest, and completely cucked out and didn't hear the case. If this case isn't worth hearing, then SCOTUS isn't worth having.

39
dickwagger 39 points ago +40 / -1

Ok. Now what? I seriously ask what is the next step? Any educated guesses?

Edit: Thanks very much for the responses. I appreciate it! It seems to me that those with deep pockets need to invest in foundational infrastructures since, you know, our government entities are not allowing a free enterprise system to exist. Very interesting, indeed.

41
iliv4gamez 41 points ago +41 / -0

It's just a wake up call to all true Americans. It's gonna take time, but now they know they need their own infrastructure set up. Every part needs to be in their control. No more relying on hosters and cloud providers. Patriots need to start investing in DNS servers, ISPs etc. They'll have the business waiting at least, 80 million Americans will want a trust worthy social media network and server platform.

19
HonkThatBitch 19 points ago +20 / -1

This won’t work either. The commies control all branches and the SCOTUS is gone. They will regulate the piss out of any movement the right now try’s. The writing is on the wall.

13
UpTrump 13 points ago +13 / -0

https://metallicman.com/laoban4site/what-the-progressive-liberals-have-in-store-for-conservatives/

read this and read parts 1-6. in short, history repeats itself and many of us will die

6
HaitchElGee 6 points ago +6 / -0

Well that's fucking terrifying. I read all of it, 1-6, and talk about a blackpill.

One thing that occurs to me is that modern instant communications/internet could potentially be a game changer in how it all pans out this time as it has never been one of the variables involved in other genocides. I've seen a few people here recently talking about getting HAM radios, and I think that might prove to be an excellent idea.

1
rbnhd76 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's some high quality doom porn right there. This isn't much better but anyway

https://youtu.be/NKX8uaW1bv0

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
11
deleted 11 points ago +12 / -1
12
CyberMagaUnderground 12 points ago +12 / -0

If you opened up that DNS server on your routers firewall, it would crash instantly as soon as people started to use it.

-7
deleted -7 points ago +1 / -8
3
day221 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why do you people come here if you hate Trump so much? Need someone to argue with now that Twitter and Reddit are far left echo chambers?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
FredWinston2.0 1 point ago +2 / -1

Out you shill. Deport!!

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-14
deleted -14 points ago +1 / -15
6
Scipio_Americanus 6 points ago +6 / -0

Except Biden didn't get a majority of the legal and verifiable votes.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
1stDickHair 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yup, just like Hillarious won the popular vote. Of illegals.
In California.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
21
etcetcetc 21 points ago +21 / -0

Secession.

Still will lead to civil war, but at least the seceding states will be free from the communist laws and purges to come.

16
YeDragonEnergy 16 points ago +16 / -0

I used to be against it- but the past few days have swayed me. The other side wants to erase us, how can you coexist with people like that? The murder of Ashli Babbit and their reaction (or lack of by “Republicans”) makes it clear what’s in store for us.

Balkanization seems inevitable.

4
Goldlight 4 points ago +4 / -0

secession and then counterstrike to take back the union

3
generated_name 3 points ago +4 / -1

Since they did not rule against him, only chose not to hear the case, that means there hasn't really be president set here and another case challenging section 230 can be brought to them that they could chose to rule on.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
3
PadaV4 3 points ago +3 / -0

that they could chose to rule on

ahahahahahah. good joke.

2
Jimmy_Russler 2 points ago +2 / -0

The constitution doesn't have standing according to them.

2
BigHandsome91 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dont use them. If their data streams dry up, so does their power.

23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
4
day221 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, I view it kind of like the mafia now. It doesn't matter much to us who is in control - we still need to pay them their cut or out windows get smashed. But among those at the top there is a power struggle so amongst themselves they care, and they use us as pawns to that end.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
18
vicentezo04 18 points ago +19 / -1

Are the "conservative" judges Trump judges or McConnell judges?

12
Liberty_or_Death 12 points ago +12 / -0

Cocaine turtle approved

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
21
deleted 21 points ago +25 / -4
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-5
newuser999 -5 points ago +1 / -6

Trump didn't win the military vote

13
Daddy_Knows_Best 13 points ago +13 / -0

Well they say trump didn’t win lots of votes...but we know better

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
17
Spooky_Lunch 17 points ago +17 / -0

So what foes SCOTUS do exactly? They don't seem to hear any cases.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
15
Ridiculousposter 15 points ago +15 / -0

Who or what is the SCOTUS? You mean that club with 9 lifetime members where they wear robes, dont do a fucking thing besides making bakers make cakes for gays and get a constant paycheck? Yea, real judges died out when bribery became a thing.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
11
thisaintitchief76 11 points ago +11 / -0

You gotta be fuckin kidding me. WHAT THE FLYING FUCK ARE YOU ASSWIPES EVEN EMPLOYED FOR!?!? Absolute HORSESHIT. They have refused ANY AND ALL cases fot the last 6 months. WHAT THE FUCK. I think its time to start removing justices one by one. Something needs to be done here because this is insane. Not even a simple court case like this has been heard by these guys. Unfuckinreal. My ass would have been fired for refusing this much work.

11
Jaqen 11 points ago +12 / -1

As much as the SCOTUS may be cucked, and knowing nothing about this case other than what can be inferred from this image, I can probably predict this:

Fyk did not read the terms of service before he signed up.

If he did, he would have seen, in black and white, that the service lays claim to all user submitted data, to do anything they want with, forever and for any reason, including deleting it.

Look, facebook is awful. But can we please stop crying about the abuses? The abuses were laid out in plain English for all to read. Never mind the constant warnings we were given for years about the inherent issues with these kinds of services.

8
sply1 8 points ago +8 / -0

Just because something is in a TOS doesn't automatically make it legal. Imagine if I put the condition in my TOS that, at my determination, I can enslave anyone who signs up for a period of three years to work without pay. It's black and white and it's in the TOS, but it doesn't magically become legal. It's a common, but very silly, misunderstanding of the law.

3
Jaqen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Contracts can not absolve crimes.

You can however forfeit rights in a contract, which is what every Facebook user agreed to do when they signed up.

2
day221 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think that should be legal, and anyone dumb enough to sign up will then receive a nice darwin award. I mean this retard is still using twitter.

4
rplgn 4 points ago +4 / -0

It should spark a debate on restricting regulations based platform status.

2
Jaqen 2 points ago +2 / -0

What is the debate?

3
ghubbz36 3 points ago +3 / -0

Plaintiff had used Facebook’s free online platform to create a series of, among other amusing things, pages dedicated to videos and pictures of people urinating. In enforcing its community standards, Plaintiff alleges that Facebook blocked content posted by Plaintiff and removed content in order to make room for its own sponsored advertisements. Plaintiff contends these actions by Facebook destroyed or severely devalued his pages.

Seems like an interesting Facebook page.

2
Jaqen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow no wonder it got laughed out of court.

  • Facebook is not a platform.

  • Facebook reserves the right to delete user submitted content, for any reason.

  • Facebook users also waive their right to seek damages.

Super dumb lawsuit.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +16 / -7
0
deleted 0 points ago +8 / -8
4
UwUwU 4 points ago +4 / -0

??

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
randomusers239874 1 point ago +1 / -0

The funny thing is that the people of every religion, including atheists, experience very similar near death experiences, and the the only ones that see Jesus are Christians. Other religions see their own religious figures, and atheists see just a "being" they tend to identify as god like, but Catholics will go on and on about how their religion is the ONLY right one. They may not be liberal in the political sense, but they are definitely liberal in the "I smell my own farts" sense.

9
estimated_prophet 9 points ago +9 / -0

Does this mean all SCOTUS rulings going forward are nulll and void since our tech overlords control everything now?

8
Chinese_spy2 8 points ago +8 / -0

Jason Fyk had "no standing," of course.

A Supreme Court Chief Justice - an easy job - don't want to hear arguments? - Just go with "no standing" - works 100% of the time.

7
Proda 7 points ago +7 / -0

Does this mean that the real commander in chief of the US will soon no longer be POTUS but rather Alphabet's (Google parent company) CEO?

6
Francis 6 points ago +6 / -0

We have to keep the lawsuits going! I'm 115% sure the next one will work, guys!

6
colinsackorpick 6 points ago +6 / -0

that's pedo John the Chief making the decision what will land on the docket. Anyone surprised by this? He's a compromised asset.

5
JoinTheDiscussion 5 points ago +5 / -0

The Warners will find data centers..

5
LtPatterson 5 points ago +5 / -0

SCOTUS only hears cases on gay bullshit and will probably start taking up cases on guns (a rarity) soon (only to ban them).

5
feminismiscancer 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fyk Facebook.

5
CommieCrats 5 points ago +5 / -0

SEVERAL PEOPLE AND A BUNCH OF COMPUTERS, SO EASY TO DEAL WITH

3
Halcyoncritter 3 points ago +3 / -0

is anyone fucking surprised? The supreme court are supreme cucks, with Thomas and Alito having the only pairs of balls among the nine of them! F U C K T H E S C

3
dookiebot 3 points ago +3 / -0

So, when can citizens just refuse to show up to court? Sounds good to me.

3
Txiribiton 3 points ago +3 / -0

Some of the most important cases ever that could define the shape of the country and be a defining and historic moment for their career and the only thing they do is waste your taxes.

2
mainsoda 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seems like only yesterday that everybody was up in arms about the SCOTUS getting too many Trump appointees. Come to find out every single one stabbed him, the constitution and all of us in the back at the first opportunity. Obviously it was nothing their evil blackmail couldn't handle. The Deep State crime family is strong and pervasive.

2
article10ECHR 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's not what 'certiorari denied' means. He's reading too much into it and in fact empowering his opponents by using this erroneous conclusion.

2
Bedminster 2 points ago +2 / -0

No reason to expand SCOTUS, they're already corrupt democrat shills. Fuck you SCOTUS you cunt sellouts.

2
bclautz 2 points ago +2 / -0

John Roberts is a traitor to the US constitution and the people of USA

2
ApocalypseWoW 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's gonna be up to We The People to fix this treachery... All legal avenues have been exhausted.

2
DaayTerkErJerbs 2 points ago +2 / -0

America died Nov 3 2020

2
TheTudes 2 points ago +2 / -0

SCOTUS smells like an unwashed SCROTUM of a homeless man

2
paradox123 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now they don't even give the ruling. They rufuse to work.-

2
Arwyn3x 2 points ago +2 / -0

There should b a way for We The People of the Constitution can force the Supreme Court to do what we ask. And we ask that they hear the evidence of wide spread Election Fraud and make a fair ruling.

Other then that we have a huge untapped resource. Every County in six States can petition any Judge to impanel Grand Juries. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia told us so way back in 1992.

Go read it and then ask yourselves "why are we laying back pretending we are helpless?

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia ruled in the landmark case of United States v. Williams,

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/504/36

Justice Scalia says in section 19:

19

The grand jury’s functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both in the scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that power is exercised.

“Unlike [a] [c]ourt, whose jurisdiction is predicated upon a specific case or controversy, the grand jury ‘can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance that it is not.’ It need not identify the offender it suspects, or even “the precise nature of the offense” it is investigating. The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation, nor does the prosecutor require leave of court to seek a grand jury indictment.

And in its day-to-day functioning, the grand jury generally operates without the interference of a presiding judge. It swears in its own witnesses, and deliberates in total secrecy.

2
PepeTheHacker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Source - It’s true

2
ColdBrewCovfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t think you can just file a case with them without going up thr ladder first.

I could be wrong, but it doesn’t sound like proper procedure to get your case heard.

1
RocksCanOnlyWait 1 point ago +1 / -0

See the "lower court" field. It can't from 9th circuit court of appeals.

2
Rocks_vs_Uzis 2 points ago +2 / -0

It isn't sad, REJOICE! Your enemy has shown you itself fully. We understand exactly how they operate and can get on the road to completely separating ourselves from them.

The best way to win this game is not to play them anymore. Noncompliance, boycotts, and parallel society should be our aim. Separate communications networks, separate banks, separate entertainment, separate schools, separate sports, separate everything. What do you think black folks did during Jim Crow? You think we crumbled and died? WE BUILT OUR OWN!

"Don't bitch, BUILD!" - Owen Benjamin

2
sun_wolf 2 points ago +2 / -0

And if it is true that President Trump never had any power, and that Presidents are all powerless to change anything, then having our election win cheated away by the CCP and DNC and corporate media doesn’t even matter.

Now I actually happen to believe President Trump is not as powerless as he seems to be, but if the fraud goes through, then yeah, voting is irrelevant and even winning a vote doesn’t matter because they aren’t even following the chain of command or legal precedent anyway.

One of the ways they used to be able to fool us was by maintaining the illusion of rules and laws. Obviously all the laws apply to us, but they and their cronies are all exempt. Is it fair? Nope. Is it hypocritical? Yep. But so what? It is what it is. The important thing is we know it now. That just freed us all to approach these problems in a new way. Nobody honest is thinking about solving this through “voting” or “protests” or “lawsuits” because none of those things exist for us.

They do not realize it yet but that shit was HIGHLY pacifying. They should have kept up the illusion because they could have strung us out for decades. But now the reality is exposed. We will adjust and free ourselves from their tyrranical faggotry another way.

BECAUSE NOBODY IS HAVING MORE FUN THAN US.

2
GOPkilledTHEMSELVES 2 points ago +2 / -0

When is the last time the Supreme Court ruled consistent with the Constitution?

2
SunnyPatriotOnFire 2 points ago +2 / -0

We are over run by communist pigs in every branch of government.

2
basedwesterner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump has been tricked into nominating those justices. The man is literally surrounded by enemies. I don’t know how he finds the strength to go on, day after day. Mr Trump, remember that the real America prays for you, and knows you’ll prevail!

2
BadManOrange 2 points ago +2 / -0

The sad truth is that Trump's three appointments were all (G.W.) Bush league. We should have expected that they'd all be deep state.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
kag-2020- 2 points ago +2 / -0

SCOTUS decided our fate when they cucked out on the case against all the election fraud. The Constitution is null and void. The criminals occupying our government facilities hate Americans. Don't expect them to lift a finger unless it is to further the cause of Communism.

1
Libertynfreedom4ever 1 point ago +1 / -0

Declining to hear a case is ruling against it. It’s not a neutral position

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Forrest_Gump 1 point ago +1 / -0

SCOTUS is bought and paid for by the CCP

1
Red888 1 point ago +1 / -0

WTF-SCOTUS!!