6268
Comments (250)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
generated_name 3 points ago +4 / -1

Since they did not rule against him, only chose not to hear the case, that means there hasn't really be president set here and another case challenging section 230 can be brought to them that they could chose to rule on.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
3
PadaV4 3 points ago +3 / -0

that they could chose to rule on

ahahahahahah. good joke.

2
Jimmy_Russler 2 points ago +2 / -0

The constitution doesn't have standing according to them.