As much as the SCOTUS may be cucked, and knowing nothing about this case other than what can be inferred from this image, I can probably predict this:
Fyk did not read the terms of service before he signed up.
If he did, he would have seen, in black and white, that the service lays claim to all user submitted data, to do anything they want with, forever and for any reason, including deleting it.
Look, facebook is awful. But can we please stop crying about the abuses? The abuses were laid out in plain English for all to read. Never mind the constant warnings we were given for years about the inherent issues with these kinds of services.
As much as the SCOTUS may be cucked, and knowing nothing about this case other than what can be inferred from this image, I can probably predict this:
Fyk did not read the terms of service before he signed up.
If he did, he would have seen, in black and white, that the service lays claim to all user submitted data, to do anything they want with, forever and for any reason, including deleting it.
Look, facebook is awful. But can we please stop crying about the abuses? The abuses were laid out in plain English for all to read. Never mind the constant warnings we were given for years about the inherent issues with these kinds of services.
It should spark a debate on restricting regulations based platform status.