The Plan will unfold whether you trust it or not! This week's going to be lit fam!
(media.patriots.win)
PEPE
Comments (42)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
No, you show evidence for your claim.
Someone claims that there's a plan, they have to show evidence.
Someone claims that there is no plan, they have to show evidence.
The default position is "I DON'T KNOW WHETHER OR NOT THERE'S A PLAN"
You stated a claim. How can you possibly know that there is no plan?
Thats not at all how it works, you are delusional. There is no plan. Saving this post for the 20th when you look like a fool.
Actually you can't prove a negative. "You can't prove that it isn't real" is never an acceptable argument. It's why the burden of proof in court is always on proving someone is guilty. This was the entire crux of the Kavanaugh hearing, it wasn't up to Kavanaugh to prove he wasn't a rapist, it was up to democrats to prove he was. It's up to you to prove there is a plan, not him to prove there isn't.
Square circles do not exist. Proof = Squares have corners, circles do not, therefore a square circle does not exist.
Just proved a negative.
The claim that you can't prove a negative is incorrect. The claim should actually be that you shouldn't try to prove a negative. This is reasoning to not CLAIM a negative, not to claim all the negatives you want simply because there's no way to prove it.
One should not make claims that they cannot prove. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Isn't that what the religious say all the time? Does an atheist have to prove there's no god to make the claim that there's no god?
The court rules the person "not guilty", because they cannot demonstrate that the person is innocent. The court has to prove you guilty, your defense does not have to prove your innocence.
It's up to any person to prove their claim. One person claims there's a plan, another person claims there's not. Each one of them could be wrong.
If you say, "There is no plan", that is a statement that could be incorrect. Since it could be incorrect, then you have a burden of proof. It is not just ASSUMED to be correct.
You post so many (wrong) things in a very disorganized and unprofessional manner. Provide evidence of "the plan" or just stop. Burden is on you. You just look stupid at this point.
Every step toward the inauguration has solidified Biden's legitimacy. The lost court cases, the state certifications, the meeting of the Electoral College, the certification by Congress.
If there was some type of plan they would not let it have gotten this far. I don't think there's a plan.
Disagree. Those things may not have had anything to do with the plan, other than exposing the people involved that are throwing these things out without looking at them.
The entire time, it could've been the Insurrection Act, and they are simply burning time with all of the other remedies, knowing that they're not gonna work, but maybe hoping that they will.
If they know from the beginning that it's going to result in them using the IA, then it doesn't matter what happens in court
I think that's wishful thinking, but who knows. We'll see who's president on the 21st and that will be the end of the issue one way or the other.
Yea that won't be the end of it.
When 80-100 million people think that tyrants just came in and stole our ability to elect our representatives, it's definitely not over.
This is exactly what the Second Amendment is for. People forget that the Second Amendment has a constitutional remedy for tyranny in it.