How many judges refused to hear them? Some people believe 50 courts cannot be corrupt. Define the number as another slide if you can. Maybe even include party affiliation. Otherwise its perfect.
“We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges,” Mr. Roberts said . “What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them.” (November 21 2018)
We really need to understand more about the 50+ courts and why we were denied an evidentiary hearing. As Scott Adams proposed, 3 columns. The claim, the court, and why it was denied. Because the Left keeps falling back to the "proof" of no fraud is that the evidence was already presented to the courts.
I admit I do not have an understanding of what went on there, as I haven't seen it presented anywhere. If someone has a source, please let me know!
Irregularities should have been enough because the statements are assumed true if there is no way to disprove them except by discovery and with info u already know. Having a case refused without being able to do discovery is damning on the courts.
How many judges refused to hear them? Some people believe 50 courts cannot be corrupt. Define the number as another slide if you can. Maybe even include party affiliation. Otherwise its perfect.
"Maybe even include party affiliation."
But, my understanding was.....
“We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges,” Mr. Roberts said . “What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them.” (November 21 2018)
info from their website. if anyone has an current number of courts refusing I will update
We really need to understand more about the 50+ courts and why we were denied an evidentiary hearing. As Scott Adams proposed, 3 columns. The claim, the court, and why it was denied. Because the Left keeps falling back to the "proof" of no fraud is that the evidence was already presented to the courts.
I admit I do not have an understanding of what went on there, as I haven't seen it presented anywhere. If someone has a source, please let me know!
Irregularities should have been enough because the statements are assumed true if there is no way to disprove them except by discovery and with info u already know. Having a case refused without being able to do discovery is damning on the courts.