8428
Comments (393)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
LawlfulEvil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Their handlers do that, and everything else, for them.

When you're herding an 80 IQ voter base, you can't expect them to do anything for themselves; you need someone to dress them, someone to tie their shoes for them, technical support to provide hotfixes for the narrative they are programmed with ("fact-checkers"), 24/7 propaganda machines, and most of all, shepherds to protect your flock from coming into contact with anyone who has a three-digit IQ and doesn't work for Big Brother.

Note that when I call these people "80 IQ", I am not trying to insult either them or anyone else who is mentally handicapped -- it's that statistically, about 10% of the population (if I recall my stats math correctly) is going to have an IQ in that range, and such people will inevitably be much easier to manipulate than someone with the average IQ of 100. It doesn't even have to be as low as 80; 17% (iirc) of the population is going to fall below 85, a level that was once considered "retarded", until that bar was pushed down to 70 for political reasons.

Consider the following:

The left justifies their actions and their political relevance through patently absurd narratives, some of which even a CHILD could see through, such as the ludicrous claims of the so-called critical race "theory" that much of their violence is based on.

Despite the fact that the majority of America can easily see through this silliness, a highly vocal minority of the population treats it as Gospel and commits acts of violence and harassment in its name.

These same people who worship at the altar of leftist narratives frequently cluster into carefully-policed echo chambers where only leftist propaganda is allowed, and anyone questioning those narratives or propaganda is aggressively censored.

Statistics predicts that a significant minority of the population will fall significantly below the intellectual mean. IQ scores have a mean of 100, a standard deviation of 15, and are normally distributed around the mean, which implies that (assuming I remember my statistics correctly):

  • about 50% of the population can be expected to have an IQ of less than 100
  • about 25% of the population can be expected to have an IQ of less than 90
  • about 16% of the population can be expected to have an IQ of less than 85
  • about 5% of the population can be expected to have an IQ of less than 75

16% of the population falls in a range that was once considered "retarded", while another 9% is barely above that...what percentage of the population was it that subscribes to "social justice" narratives, again?