Says Twitter and Pelosi, and their shills. Pelosi has no authority to impeach the President for protected free speech, but once Twitter acted, Pelosi acted. Conspiracy. Malicious prosecution. Abuse of process. If Pelosi filed first, Twitter could use that as a defense for deplatforming the President. But Pelosi wouldn’t file unconstitutional impeachment charges unless she could do it under cover of Twitter deplatforming first.
Ok. Clearly you refuse to recognize when Trump explicitly said peacefully make your voices heard at the Capitol, and the incursion was already taking place, this protected free speech is not a high crime or misdemeanor, nor was Trump inciting any violence. The idea Pelosi could independently file charges for impeachment is conspiracy theory nonsense; in fact it would be unconstitutional for her to do so. Absolute foolishness for the speaker of the house to even contemplate anything so ridiculous. But when the founder and CEO of the company making the platform Trump uses as his hallmark tool and harnesses like a master to communicate with his supporters, with his holier-than-thou legal team with their above-the-law reasoning and a speaker of the house in their pocket, falsely claims Trump actually incited violence when he didn’t, only a denier would not recognize that as a bold move ripe for prosecution. But when Pelosi then answers the nefarious Twitter ban with actually filing unconstitutional impeachment charges, Twitter owns it. Twitter incited Pelosi to file impeachment charges, it is an abuse of the legal system for Twitter to incite the speaker this way. The two actors were not independent, and our laws need to recognize this, even if you can’t.
She impeached only after Twitter acted, her action is unconstitutional, as speaker of the house it is imperceivable she would file for impeachment on unconstitutional grounds except for the actions of Twitter, a powerful messaging tool Trump regularly uses to communicate with the public at large—which Twitter removed from Trump, thereby enticing Pelosi to impeach, which she did.
Says Twitter and Pelosi, and their shills. Pelosi has no authority to impeach the President for protected free speech, but once Twitter acted, Pelosi acted. Conspiracy. Malicious prosecution. Abuse of process. If Pelosi filed first, Twitter could use that as a defense for deplatforming the President. But Pelosi wouldn’t file unconstitutional impeachment charges unless she could do it under cover of Twitter deplatforming first.
Ok. Clearly you refuse to recognize when Trump explicitly said peacefully make your voices heard at the Capitol, and the incursion was already taking place, this protected free speech is not a high crime or misdemeanor, nor was Trump inciting any violence. The idea Pelosi could independently file charges for impeachment is conspiracy theory nonsense; in fact it would be unconstitutional for her to do so. Absolute foolishness for the speaker of the house to even contemplate anything so ridiculous. But when the founder and CEO of the company making the platform Trump uses as his hallmark tool and harnesses like a master to communicate with his supporters, with his holier-than-thou legal team with their above-the-law reasoning and a speaker of the house in their pocket, falsely claims Trump actually incited violence when he didn’t, only a denier would not recognize that as a bold move ripe for prosecution. But when Pelosi then answers the nefarious Twitter ban with actually filing unconstitutional impeachment charges, Twitter owns it. Twitter incited Pelosi to file impeachment charges, it is an abuse of the legal system for Twitter to incite the speaker this way. The two actors were not independent, and our laws need to recognize this, even if you can’t.
She impeached only after Twitter acted, her action is unconstitutional, as speaker of the house it is imperceivable she would file for impeachment on unconstitutional grounds except for the actions of Twitter, a powerful messaging tool Trump regularly uses to communicate with the public at large—which Twitter removed from Trump, thereby enticing Pelosi to impeach, which she did.