5858
Comments (599)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
10
TrumpAndGodWin 10 points ago +10 / -0

What's your intent, it's not like it's bad to have multiple free speech sites.

3
Deplora 3 points ago +4 / -1

it's not like it's bad to have multiple free speech sites

No, but I'm not convinced that either Gab or Parler is capable of reaching the critical mass needed to break Twitter's monopoly. If they would pool their resources and merge, instead of competing with each other, we'd be more likely to see Twitter really losing influence, and Gab-Parler would be better able to build the kind of tech infrastructure that can resist politically motivated efforts (both legal and illegal) to take the site down.

3
SuckMyAnusTwitter 3 points ago +4 / -1

We don’t need them to beat twitter or “break up Twitter”

They will provide platforms for tens of millions (or more) of people - particularly conservatives who are being censored everywhere- a place to talk, discuss and share like minded ideas, opinions and thoughts along with actual non fake and non biased news.

2
easyonthefiber 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly. It’s good to have Royal Farms, WaWa, Sheetz, and Rutters in PA, but we all know which is the best, and there is room for all four of them in the market.