Antitrust. Underhanded tactics to stifle competition is a violation of such. It always has been. Just rarely reinforced because corruption and lobbying.
This seems like a bit of a stretch. Google is a search engine that prioritizes results from within it's network. There are so many concrete issues, this seems like wasteful litigation.
But why wouldn't they be able to do this?
Antitrust. Underhanded tactics to stifle competition is a violation of such. It always has been. Just rarely reinforced because corruption and lobbying.
This seems like a bit of a stretch. Google is a search engine that prioritizes results from within it's network. There are so many concrete issues, this seems like wasteful litigation.
Maybe. But the fact that yt bears a different name has me wondering.
Now that's delicious. God speed, Rumble!
We all need to sue these commie companies nonstop