Comments (131)
sorted by:
16
Ryan192 16 points ago +17 / -1

no

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
10
marsajane1949 10 points ago +10 / -0

Lol doubting what you saw with your own eyes, then they hide the evidence from you that is legally ours and technically illegal for them to do. Yeah right

-6
deleted -6 points ago +1 / -7
6
marsajane1949 6 points ago +6 / -0

The stopping of counting and keeping out of poll watchers is enough. They cheated. It’s obvious. They even did unconstitutional shit with unconstitutional laws and courts. Why do all that? We voted the same for 250 years. Now they change all kinds of shit! No, they fucking cheated

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
marsajane1949 3 points ago +4 / -1

They wrote laws in Georgia to not look at fucking signatures. Same shit is Pennsylvania through the courts. The courts can’t do that, only the legislature. It’s unconstitutional. Very. Judges don’t write laws and that’s what they did in Pennsylvania.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
mrs.rose 2 points ago +3 / -1

Right. Dead people voting is totally not fraud. Youre not even trying

0
TheJimmReaper 0 points ago +2 / -2

Bless you really are an idiot arent you

So you mean to tell me everything about this election month seemed legit to you?

You don't think it's odd some counties all stopped counting at around the same time?

You don't find it odd that after reporting they'd stopped video surfaced of them pulling ballots out from under a table and sending them through Dominion tabulatars 3,4 & 5 times per stack

You don't think it's iffy some Democrat states were allowed to vote upto 3 days AFTER elecrion day like everyone else???

You don't see anything wrong with the guy who gaffed his way through his campaign, all 3 days he wasn't hiding in his basement, who couldn't get more than 30 people to turn up, is suddenly apparently more popular than Trump who also just set the record as the most popular sitting President by 12m

There's way too much evidence and actual recorded illegal fuckery to just simply ignore, but the Democrats did because Patriots have become to cowardly or to dumb

It's a hard truth, but truth nonetheless

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
-1
TheJimmReaper -1 points ago +2 / -3

Lol they're totally fine with going out and rioting for 9 months... But can't go to support their guy when he speaks???

Okay so why couldn't old Joe get more than 100 people to watch his live internet events?

Trump.easily.gets 100,000+ people to turn up to an event with less than a days notice... Hell 30,000 Cubans in Florida held a street party for Trump and he wasn't even there

But Biden somehow is more popular than Trump?

Are you for real

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
TheJimmReaper 0 points ago +2 / -2

So why couldn't he get more than 70 people to watch him live on the internet???

Trump streams get millions, but Biden is more popular... I don't think so

Also all the massive amounts of election fuckery + Biden not having many supporters = MASSIVE FUCKING FRAUD

Also why have the left gone out of their way to no prove Biden legitimately won???

You'd think crazy Nancy would wanna throw that it Trumps face, but nope, the Dems have sough to cover up or destroy evidence & records

But sure Covid is why Biden supporters don't go to his events... They can mingle together as they Burn, Loot & Murder while rioting for Nike's for 9 months, but they can't take an hour to go see Biden live or watch his live streams

Makes total sense, totally legit win because the Dems & corrupt MSM told us, despite they can't back it up or actually legally dispute the evidence

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
10
Mrsattorney 10 points ago +13 / -3

People with critical thinking skills know he won bigly. I guess you are lacking in that department.

5
Ryan192 5 points ago +6 / -1

yuuuuuuge

9
couranto 9 points ago +10 / -1

Yeah Biden winning 1 of 19 bellwether counties was the clincher for me. Or winning the most votes with the least counties. Clown world etc Lol.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
8
Threaper666 8 points ago +9 / -1

No. There is more than enough evidence he was cheated out of his victory.

8
DoubleEagle 8 points ago +8 / -0

All we wanted was an audit to address all the anomalies and answer that exact question.

5
NeverGiveUp1 5 points ago +5 / -0

Have you not been watching the evidence? It couldn’t be any more obvious if they tried.

4
BiglyMagaMamma2 4 points ago +4 / -0

There is far more evidence that he won by a landslide than there is evidence that Biden won 80 million fucking votes.

4
Notchinese 4 points ago +4 / -0

No handshakes for you.

4
Songofsixpence 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lol seriously? Did you not see the suitcases come out of the ceiling in Georgia? So much evidence...

4
HeavenlyTrumpets 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is it possible basement dementia patient who hid for a year got 80 million votes?

No... it's not.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +2 / -7
2
HeavenlyTrumpets 2 points ago +2 / -0

keep telling yourself that

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
HeavenlyTrumpets 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not the point. The point is how did POTUS do in 2020 vs 2016. He did better everywhere EXCEPT FOR those few cities in those few states. It does not add up, and that's only one thing that doesn't add up.

3
1984means1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

Very unlikely.

You have two things going on here.

  1. Did Trump lose due to unlawful changes made without the states legislators pushed through due to "covid?" We'll call this Semi-Legal Fraud.

  2. Did Trump lose due to blatant fraud IE. fake ballots, diverted ballots, destroyed ballots, computer manipulation? We'll call this Fraud.

It was likely due to BOTH. If you eliminate semi-legal fraud TRUMP WON. I am pretty sure that they knew that this wouldn't be enough and also manipulated votes. This could EASILY be checked by using some of the methods of forensic ballot audits that Jovan Pulitzer has talked about. The fact that the state governments WILL NOT let them do this should be very telling.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
Gunsmonkey22 3 points ago +3 / -0

That would have sucked to know most of the country was mind controlled though tv and social media. But the facts show that was not the case. So no, it's not possible, because if you look at the evidence, it was and has been proven illegal votes switched the results in the needed states.

3
Covfefe_Baby 3 points ago +3 / -0

1 giveaway is how few counties Biden won in comparison to Trump.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +2 / -6
4
HeavenlyTrumpets 4 points ago +4 / -0

POTUS did better everywhere in 2020 than he did in 2016. That is a better measure. The only place he "didn't" is in those 4-5 municipalities that flipped it. None of it adds up. There are many indicators that have been reliable for 200+ years that point to a Trump win... but magically 4-5 cities flipped it... under unspeakably dubious circumstances.

Biden didn't win. Trump won. We are never going to accept the lie so stop trying.

3
mrs.rose 3 points ago +3 / -0

And ONLY counties with much higher populations. Not a fucking chance dude.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
mrs.rose 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your point has nothing to do with what I just said.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
mrs.rose 2 points ago +2 / -0

If Biden truly won, we would expect him to have some increase in votes in both high population counties and maybe just a few lower population counties too. But it virtually does not exist. He literally only performed better in astronomically higher proportions in Milwaukee, Detroit, Atlanta, and Philadelphia. No statistical models can explain this turnout distribution. Especially when there were more votes than registered voters in some of these precincts. I call bullshit on millions of people registering to vote same day. Does not happen. Youre being foolish.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
LemonTree 2 points ago +2 / -0

If u read MSM only...

No way so many people lie for Trump. No one did for Mitten or McCain.

2
Masjosh 2 points ago +2 / -0

🙄

1
Warchant59 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, it's possible. There is actually a huge amount of evidence (not proof, don't confuse them) that he didn't lose. There are many highly unlikely events, some firsts in US election history even, that all happened at once. There are odd occurrences during counting, a pattern of refusal to hear the evidence in a formal legal setting, a pattern of accusation and threat towards those that push for it to be heard and massive campaign of propaganda to deny that ANY EVIDENCE AT ALL even exists.

We can't be confident when the evidence screams out for investigation and the system is used to REFUSE to investigate instead of doing it's real job, which is to guarantee the results of the election can be trusted.

That's the problem, whether he won or lost.

1
RoninIV 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's possible (unlikely), but we'll never know. Additionally, all the resistance against actually counting and investigating the charges of fraud have made it look beyond a doubt that he did.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
Updoot 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you can explain the multiple late-night vertical vote bumps that only happened for Joe Biden, then sure I'm down. I'm not a statistician, but that looks really bad.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
JohnCocktoastin 0 points ago +1 / -1

Use your head. Pennsylvania mail ballots were something like 1.7 mil D 630k R and 320k Independent. Biden gets 2 million mail ballots, trump gets nearly 600k. How would that ratio explain 600k vote dump for Biden at 3 and 4am and 3200 for Trump? You’re falling for a larp on mail ballot stats. No state had mail ballots at Bashar al Asad levels.

Additionally, exit polling shows trump getting 95% of rep vote and Biden around 92% of D vote. If Libertarians got nearly 25k votes in PA, are you really buying that pretty much every single independent voter voted for Biden? You don’t need a tin foil hat for this one. That is prima facie bullshit.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
AnthonyS 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is the worst possible answer to everything we have just witnessed. It is also the most illogical answer to everything we have witnessed.

1
DebbieinDallas 1 point ago +3 / -2

HER ACCOUNT IS JUST 9 HRS OLD! IGNORE HER. SHE IS AN IDIOT LIB TROLLING YOU!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
thallos 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course he could have. But if you're not sure about it then that is the problem with the system. The problem isn't that he won and there was fraud absolutely, its that there could have been fraud and he could have won but the election systems do not provide adequate transparency and auditability to know either way with adequate certainty.

It could be easy to be certain, it's technologically achievable yet it is not. Which leads one to wonder why the system being used is so obfuscates and untrustworthy and hackable.

The fact is that it's plausible that the election was rigged and he did indeed won and without a thorough examination or valid audit trail with repeatable results that possibility is at least as probable as the opposite. If you then couple that with meta analysis and many affidavits the probability increases.

Maybe he did indeed lose. Prove it.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Prove? You need a trial to prove. When you get booted for standing or laches, you don’t ever get to present evidence. Judges that boot you on procedural grounds and then claim no evidence are just outing themselves as spineless or hacks. Neither gets you a day in court to prove your case.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
Random_byte 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’d accept this only if we got a full publicly transparent audit with affidavits from every counterpoint argument. Right now it’s just statements from officials which are worthless Toilet paper unless in an affidavit

1
Nomad1 1 point ago +3 / -2

No. He didnt. There was extensive analysis of the the data, votes, and inconsistencies of all.sorts. additionally the separate issue of state level.changes to laws that were unconstitutional. Trump won and that is undeniable.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Nomad1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Here you go: have a look for yourself. https://hereistheevidence.com/

-1
deleted -1 points ago +0 / -1
1
Nomad1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Opposing what audit? That would have been great.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Nomad1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you missing some screws in your head? What are you even talking about.

1
Nomad1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Great. Here is the evidence https://hereistheevidence.com/

0
Nomad1 0 points ago +1 / -1

You asked for evidence here it is: https://hereistheevidence.com/

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Nomad1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you from China? Are you familiar with Tienamn Sqre massacre?

0
Nomad1 0 points ago +1 / -1

You realize I'm just going to keep posting the web address and you are helping.people see it? So thank you.

https://hereistheevidence.com/

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Nomad1 0 points ago +1 / -1

Are you from China? Are you familiar with Tienamen Square 1989 massacre? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
Patriotva757 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol not a chance in hell a potato beat out Orange man Rad.

0
JoGen 0 points ago +1 / -1

N O P E

0
TheJimmReaper 0 points ago +1 / -1

And what about all the actual evidence??? You know the videos, audio files, witnesses, whistleblowers, affidavits, data points, ballot drops, count stops, broken/ illegally amended Constitutional laws, independent audit samples, GLITCHES, live broadcasts of Trump loosing votes on screen then being given to Biden, the USB finds in high school gyms, the fact that they accepted ballots for a week after election day, and were still "counting" 5 weeks later, the BS water main break and all the rest

Thats without all the Dominion stuff, and the fact they can't actually produce receipts as records "accidentally" got destroyed/wiped which is also illegal

Or the fact that half of the country tried to sue the other half for fraud but got told they had no standing from SCOTUS who also ruled no standing for Trump (who clearly has standing) SCOTUS used the "No Standing" as a way to not have to rule on the evidence as the evidence is overwhelming!!!

Plus after Bidens basement campaign and the fact NOBODY likes him or Kamala do you really believe he's more popular than Trump??? Because i see no Biden movement (other than his catheter bag) no Biden dot loser website

So short answer NO FUCKING WAY

0
HeavenlyTrumpets 0 points ago +1 / -1

You say you want references but the truth is you don't want to know. This has been thoroughly uncovered and gone over for months now, and if you really wanted to know the truth, you'd open your eyes and look for it yourself instead of trying to get a bunch of tired people on a message board to spoon feed you.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
FiDollaMilkshake 0 points ago +2 / -2

It's not controversial. Just, at this point, STUPID.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Crizpy 0 points ago +1 / -1

Such laziness. Start here lady: https://hereistheevidence.com

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
0
Crizpy 0 points ago +1 / -1

lol. did you just read through 1000s of articles, affidavits, witness testimonies in 3 minutes. niiiiice. fucking shill

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-1
Crizpy -1 points ago +1 / -2

Nah. You're a shill cunt

-2
deleted -2 points ago +2 / -4