They would never join Gab in the first place because they can't control it
Gab doesn't manipulate votes or censor the free speech, so those fuckers would face real actual resistance if they did dare to signup.
And it would actually be fun to watch, imagine Biden saying something stupid and the top replies would be real American patriots instead of those Chinese bots (which ain't bots but human slaves).
I don't believe in censorship, a based platform must stand by it's principles all the time. And we also have actual arguments against the left so we have absolutely no reason to silence them. They're the ones who lack arguments, that's why they censor different opinions.
The whole SJW ideology is about justifying racial discrimination. Don't go down that path, even tho it may seem tempting. If Gab started censoring now, what stops people from going back to twatter? That's right, nothing and we'll be back on square one again. Asking for free speech but there's no alternative around.
Most free speech sites and even most of dark net are against pedophilia, which is good. I just don't wanna see censorship of different opinions, because that's how you lover yourself to leftist levels.
Kids shouldn't be online anyway, parents need to take responsibility and educate their children about the risks online. Schools should help with that too.
This is dumb. Gab is for total free speech as stated by its creator. Even international criminals get to talk about whatever they want. Either we are better than the left, or we don't try. The bar isn't that high to begin with. Let's not debase ourselves.
This is exactly why we need based platforms that always allow free speech. Have you already forgotten what happened a few days ago? Would be a shame when people start being sent to camps if even Gab where to censor posts warning about it, don't you think?
Or "inciting violence" like they did to Trump? There's a legal system, which ain't supposed to be corrupt, that's the system which should regulate that sort of things, not big tech platforms.
You think Twatter or FB, block pedophiles from communicating with children? of course they don't, Biden is still there. It's all arbitrary.
I'd almost rather the platform got bigger, they let Biden et Al on and monitored their comma and maybe even used it to install soyware on their devices.
I wouldn't let children on that platform to communicate with pedophiles, just like in real life, because that's my responsibility as a guardian. Pedos who do manage to communicate with minors to facilitate abuse or groom them should be prosecuted by the law, with any relevant communications turned over as evidence to law enforcement (gab already does this).
All this talk of pedophilia gets my suspicion up. Maybe u/malktonent1776 is a pedophile or worse and should be cancelled. Don't bother defending yourself, you have no rights anymore. You have been cancelled on every platform, every service, etc. In fact, anyone I don't like or who doesn't meet the purity test for today's doctrine can be called whatever buzz word is most effective in unpersoning them if that's the game (no rights because feelings).
Short sighted moves like this always turn into twilight zone shit. Learn from what they did to Alex Jones.
OTOH, if it gets to the point where the state revokes the inalienable rights in the constitution, then the founders had solutions for that too.
I think they should put fact checks under each Democrats' post, which links to the multitude of election offenses that never were tried on court.
On a second note, any media that posts a story about unnamed sources should also be fact checked as to whether they are doing their journalistic duty. When is the last time you have seen these so called journalists get quotes on the record.
Dude,
You're talking about Joseph R. Biden Jr.,
Joseph R. Biden ( a.k.a. Joseph R. Biden Sr. ) is Dead.
But I like that you use almost all of his name.
This can be important in the next week or so.
Joseph R. Biden Jr. is alleged President Elect ( due to massive voter fraud )
It's his birth name according Wikipedia, and legal name according to Congress, etc.
His father's name was, to the best of my knowledge, Joseph R. Biden.
This name is his name on the Biden's family tree. If he doesn't legally change it to Joseph R. Biden Sr. then he was still Joseph R. Biden.
The reason this matters will be apparent when I finish my post, probably tomorrow.
There is a slight but important possibility that this could make a significance change in things.
Thanks for the question. I need to be as succinct as possible in describing these important differences.
Don't worry.
I'll post it and you'll see.
You don't have to be concerned at all. It's the "big guy" who may have a concern. I'm crossing my fingers on this one.
Peace.
But do we really want to participate in the same assault on Freedom of Speech that the Left does?
Not me. The truth is the ultimate red pill.
yes.
And it would actually be fun to watch, imagine Biden saying something stupid and the top replies would be real American patriots instead of those Chinese bots (which ain't bots but human slaves).
I don't believe in censorship, a based platform must stand by it's principles all the time. And we also have actual arguments against the left so we have absolutely no reason to silence them. They're the ones who lack arguments, that's why they censor different opinions.
But we have nothing to fear from their lies-silencing them indicates such.
The morons on the left also believe that
So what lat them speak all the shit they want. Use it against them. If you ban them they will just become martyrs
The myopia is astounding
Ikr. We're supposed to be the side who learns from history, not the ones who rewrite it.
The whole SJW ideology is about justifying racial discrimination. Don't go down that path, even tho it may seem tempting. If Gab started censoring now, what stops people from going back to twatter? That's right, nothing and we'll be back on square one again. Asking for free speech but there's no alternative around.
Most free speech sites and even most of dark net are against pedophilia, which is good. I just don't wanna see censorship of different opinions, because that's how you lover yourself to leftist levels.
Kids shouldn't be online anyway, parents need to take responsibility and educate their children about the risks online. Schools should help with that too.
You think the left doesn't feel justified?
This is dumb. Gab is for total free speech as stated by its creator. Even international criminals get to talk about whatever they want. Either we are better than the left, or we don't try. The bar isn't that high to begin with. Let's not debase ourselves.
This is exactly why we need based platforms that always allow free speech. Have you already forgotten what happened a few days ago? Would be a shame when people start being sent to camps if even Gab where to censor posts warning about it, don't you think?
Or "inciting violence" like they did to Trump? There's a legal system, which ain't supposed to be corrupt, that's the system which should regulate that sort of things, not big tech platforms.
You think Twatter or FB, block pedophiles from communicating with children? of course they don't, Biden is still there. It's all arbitrary.
I'd almost rather the platform got bigger, they let Biden et Al on and monitored their comma and maybe even used it to install soyware on their devices.
"No first amendment for you" - sounds like Jack Dorsey
That's a red herring.
I wouldn't let children on that platform to communicate with pedophiles, just like in real life, because that's my responsibility as a guardian. Pedos who do manage to communicate with minors to facilitate abuse or groom them should be prosecuted by the law, with any relevant communications turned over as evidence to law enforcement (gab already does this).
All this talk of pedophilia gets my suspicion up. Maybe u/malktonent1776 is a pedophile or worse and should be cancelled. Don't bother defending yourself, you have no rights anymore. You have been cancelled on every platform, every service, etc. In fact, anyone I don't like or who doesn't meet the purity test for today's doctrine can be called whatever buzz word is most effective in unpersoning them if that's the game (no rights because feelings).
Short sighted moves like this always turn into twilight zone shit. Learn from what they did to Alex Jones.
OTOH, if it gets to the point where the state revokes the inalienable rights in the constitution, then the founders had solutions for that too.
You get an A+ in missing the point. At least you have a platform from which to miss though.
Fuck, let them stay on and get mercilessly hounded.
Biden on an actual free speech platform would get absolutely roasted. I don’t know why you guys wouldn’t want to see that.
I think they should put fact checks under each Democrats' post, which links to the multitude of election offenses that never were tried on court.
On a second note, any media that posts a story about unnamed sources should also be fact checked as to whether they are doing their journalistic duty. When is the last time you have seen these so called journalists get quotes on the record.
Dude,
You're talking about Joseph R. Biden Jr., Joseph R. Biden ( a.k.a. Joseph R. Biden Sr. ) is Dead.
But I like that you use almost all of his name.
This can be important in the next week or so.
Joseph R. Biden Jr. is alleged President Elect ( due to massive voter fraud )
It's his birth name according Wikipedia, and legal name according to Congress, etc.
His father's name was, to the best of my knowledge, Joseph R. Biden.
This name is his name on the Biden's family tree. If he doesn't legally change it to Joseph R. Biden Sr. then he was still Joseph R. Biden.
The reason this matters will be apparent when I finish my post, probably tomorrow.
There is a slight but important possibility that this could make a significance change in things.
Thanks for the question. I need to be as succinct as possible in describing these important differences.
Don't worry.
I'll post it and you'll see.
You don't have to be concerned at all. It's the "big guy" who may have a concern. I'm crossing my fingers on this one.
Peace.
Based