My brother-in-law says the fraud was negligible and the "statistical impossibilities" claims are based on incorrect data. Do you have references to some of the impossibilities that hasn't been deboonked? I'd like to show it to him.
He lives in PA and he knows about the legislature argument. The Republican Legislature in PA passed the laws allowing mail-in ballots in 2019. They later claimed it was unconstitutional (at the state level) but the constitution doesn't actually prohibit it. It's frustrating. I've tried to read the US Supreme Court briefs related to the case and it's too complicated for me to understand.
Title 77 is unconstitutional under the PA state constitution. This was the main argument of Mike Kelly and Sean Parnell's case. Also, even if it were constitutional, the liberal PA Supreme Court, made rulings which violated Title 77. See this archived article from Alexander Macris who is of course now removed from Substack.
My brother-in-law says the fraud was negligible and the "statistical impossibilities" claims are based on incorrect data. Do you have references to some of the impossibilities that hasn't been deboonked? I'd like to show it to him.
He lives in PA and he knows about the legislature argument. The Republican Legislature in PA passed the laws allowing mail-in ballots in 2019. They later claimed it was unconstitutional (at the state level) but the constitution doesn't actually prohibit it. It's frustrating. I've tried to read the US Supreme Court briefs related to the case and it's too complicated for me to understand.
Title 77 is unconstitutional under the PA state constitution. This was the main argument of Mike Kelly and Sean Parnell's case. Also, even if it were constitutional, the liberal PA Supreme Court, made rulings which violated Title 77. See this archived article from Alexander Macris who is of course now removed from Substack.