Wow, you really still believe these fake "fact checks" from MSM sources? Jesse Morgan disagrees. He said all law enforcement wanted to do when they interviewed him was question his motives etc. Totally uninterested in investigating the alleged crime itself of transporting those ballots across state lines or the missing trailer.
Also, the NYT bombshell about "disavowal" was also completely false. Watch the Project Veritas videos immediately after where the guy says NYT should retract the story and he never disavowed. They even released a full recording of the struggle session the USPS OIG agent put him through. Guess they didn't expect him to be wearing a wire. In fact, this incident alone shows how utterly politically biased the USPS was.
Refer to the Carter-Baker Report of 2005, which states "Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud". This understanding is the reason PA and other states didn't just allow anyone to do it.
Yeah, I know about the denial of the USPS worker disavowal. I personally put this in the category of "who really knows" at this point. Other news outlets claim that Project Veritas actually wrote the postal worker's claim in the first place. In any case, it's hardly damning proof of anything without any hard evidence of ballot backdating.
The Carter-Baker Report also said with proper safeguards, there was little evidence of voter fraud with mail-in voting. In May, the Carter Center urged federal and state governments to expand access to vote-by-mail options.
Wow, you really still believe these fake "fact checks" from MSM sources? Jesse Morgan disagrees. He said all law enforcement wanted to do when they interviewed him was question his motives etc. Totally uninterested in investigating the alleged crime itself of transporting those ballots across state lines or the missing trailer.
Also, the NYT bombshell about "disavowal" was also completely false. Watch the Project Veritas videos immediately after where the guy says NYT should retract the story and he never disavowed. They even released a full recording of the struggle session the USPS OIG agent put him through. Guess they didn't expect him to be wearing a wire. In fact, this incident alone shows how utterly politically biased the USPS was.
As the a reference for historical understanding, it has been understood for a long time that absentee voting is not intended to be unconditional (and for obvious reasons). Refer to this PA statute for example which enumerates the reasons one can vote absentee: https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/LI/consCheck.cfm?txtType=HTM&ttl=25&div=0&chpt=33
Refer to the Carter-Baker Report of 2005, which states "Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud". This understanding is the reason PA and other states didn't just allow anyone to do it.
Yeah, I know about the denial of the USPS worker disavowal. I personally put this in the category of "who really knows" at this point. Other news outlets claim that Project Veritas actually wrote the postal worker's claim in the first place. In any case, it's hardly damning proof of anything without any hard evidence of ballot backdating.
The Carter-Baker Report also said with proper safeguards, there was little evidence of voter fraud with mail-in voting. In May, the Carter Center urged federal and state governments to expand access to vote-by-mail options.
https://cartercenter.org/news/pr/2020/united-states-050620.html
I'm going to pop out of this thread at this point before I ask one-too-many questions and really piss people off. Thanks to everyone for the info.