There is no legal battle when there is a consistent refusal to engage the evidence.
IF the Rule of Law still held sway over America (and it doesn't), the courts would have been obligated to take the case, look at the evidence with respect to the law, and make a decision based on that evidence.
Trump would have won had his case been heard.
This is why the Rule of Law is so very, very important.
That's not a false hope, like you're presenting here.
In fact, Trump, in not being allowed to present his case, actually won. He demonstrated just how far the rot had gotten, how far the enemies of our nation had driven the fatal stake into our nation's heart.
And with regards to the 6th - even 2 days before, Pence was talking hand-in-hand with Trump about about counting all the legally certified votes ONLY.
Trump is not responsible for Pence's treachery and betrayal - that is solely on Pence.
Maybe you want to portray Trump as some kind of end-game fuck-up, but I don't.
No, he didn't lose the legal battle.
There is no legal battle when there is a consistent refusal to engage the evidence.
IF the Rule of Law still held sway over America (and it doesn't), the courts would have been obligated to take the case, look at the evidence with respect to the law, and make a decision based on that evidence.
Trump would have won had his case been heard.
This is why the Rule of Law is so very, very important.
That's not a false hope, like you're presenting here.
In fact, Trump, in not being allowed to present his case, actually won. He demonstrated just how far the rot had gotten, how far the enemies of our nation had driven the fatal stake into our nation's heart.
And with regards to the 6th - even 2 days before, Pence was talking hand-in-hand with Trump about about counting all the legally certified votes ONLY.
Trump is not responsible for Pence's treachery and betrayal - that is solely on Pence.
Maybe you want to portray Trump as some kind of end-game fuck-up, but I don't.