What is your Source? Myself and every historian of the 7th century is dying to know this secret source you are hiding from everyone. The Koran is not a narrative like the bible. The details of Mohammad's life were written hundreds of years after his death circa 900 AD. His sayings are nothing more than an amalgamation of previous local religions. For example ancient Zoroastrian dental hygiene laws that just so happen to become sayings of the prophet after the fall of Persia.
TL;dr The real difference being if you apply the finiest Atheist comb to Christianity, nobody cuts your head off. But at least I can verify that Jesus existed from Roman sources. Islam emerges out of a shadow of swords, birthed in a historical mystery much like nearly every ancient religion.
I'd hate to burst your bubble but muhammad's life is much better well known and recorded than the life of jesus. I personally do not believe he was a prophet. And why do you trust those roman sources? Is the vatican any less corrupt? They are responsible for. Muhammad's life and teachings were well documented. I christian btw the old style Armeniam orthodox. I don't take Rome and the vatican to be the keepers of the word of christ. You can also confirm jesus existed through greek history. and many others in the region.not just the vatican. Which is infiltrated by globohomos and child molesters. The koran was recorded during Mohammeds life and very soon after his death. His beleivers not only took their quran to be the word of god, and people memorized his speeches.
Say what you want but what we understsnd about Mohammed the profit is historically very accurate compared to other historical religious figures.
I'm not questioning the facts in the bible. But that stuff was finally collected way after the death of our Lord. They were having Mohammed on his death bed recording all his visions and premonitions. Many believed he was a prophet during his life. Jesus was thought of as a homeless vagabond. That's all I'm saying.
I'm not here to compare the brutality of islam vs Christians. Im Armenian dude. Do you really feel the need to tell me that?
Here is what I was trying to say. They Koran is actually a collection of writings from people who actually knew and saw muhammad in the flesh. Although the stupid fucker couldn't read or write, others could.
I believe In Jesus Christ as my Lord and savior. But it's unfortunate we don't know as much about him as we do about muhammad. Which might be due to the fact jesus came much longer before muhammad and islam.
Edit. I know you mentioned you believe in the roman records about jesus but don't believe all the historical documentation from the arab peninsula around 700 AD? Can I ask you what it takes for you to actually trust a source of information and consider i lt legitimate?
I understand it's really complicated and I'll admit I'm not aware of all the history. I just feel if you claim Mohammed didn't even exist (bold claim) what's to stop people from saying Jesus even existed? Muhammad left a huge blood line. Jesus didn't. Didn't even have any siblings as far as anyone knows.
We all know here which is the preferable ideology. Why don't you just discredit islam for the barbarian Mohammed was compared to the actual son of God? Jesus never raped a 7 year old. If you're saying muhammad didn't exist, are you telling me there was no Aisha? Mohammed wasn't a pedo war lord?
What is your Source? Myself and every historian of the 7th century is dying to know this secret source you are hiding from everyone. The Koran is not a narrative like the bible. The details of Mohammad's life were written hundreds of years after his death circa 900 AD. His sayings are nothing more than an amalgamation of previous local religions. For example ancient Zoroastrian dental hygiene laws that just so happen to become sayings of the prophet after the fall of Persia.
TL;dr The real difference being if you apply the finiest Atheist comb to Christianity, nobody cuts your head off. But at least I can verify that Jesus existed from Roman sources. Islam emerges out of a shadow of swords, birthed in a historical mystery much like nearly every ancient religion.
I'd hate to burst your bubble but muhammad's life is much better well known and recorded than the life of jesus. I personally do not believe he was a prophet. And why do you trust those roman sources? Is the vatican any less corrupt? They are responsible for. Muhammad's life and teachings were well documented. I christian btw the old style Armeniam orthodox. I don't take Rome and the vatican to be the keepers of the word of christ. You can also confirm jesus existed through greek history. and many others in the region.not just the vatican. Which is infiltrated by globohomos and child molesters. The koran was recorded during Mohammeds life and very soon after his death. His beleivers not only took their quran to be the word of god, and people memorized his speeches.
Say what you want but what we understsnd about Mohammed the profit is historically very accurate compared to other historical religious figures.
I'm not questioning the facts in the bible. But that stuff was finally collected way after the death of our Lord. They were having Mohammed on his death bed recording all his visions and premonitions. Many believed he was a prophet during his life. Jesus was thought of as a homeless vagabond. That's all I'm saying.
Missing the point
I'm not here to compare the brutality of islam vs Christians. Im Armenian dude. Do you really feel the need to tell me that?
Here is what I was trying to say. They Koran is actually a collection of writings from people who actually knew and saw muhammad in the flesh. Although the stupid fucker couldn't read or write, others could.
I believe In Jesus Christ as my Lord and savior. But it's unfortunate we don't know as much about him as we do about muhammad. Which might be due to the fact jesus came much longer before muhammad and islam.
Edit. I know you mentioned you believe in the roman records about jesus but don't believe all the historical documentation from the arab peninsula around 700 AD? Can I ask you what it takes for you to actually trust a source of information and consider i lt legitimate?
I understand it's really complicated and I'll admit I'm not aware of all the history. I just feel if you claim Mohammed didn't even exist (bold claim) what's to stop people from saying Jesus even existed? Muhammad left a huge blood line. Jesus didn't. Didn't even have any siblings as far as anyone knows.
We all know here which is the preferable ideology. Why don't you just discredit islam for the barbarian Mohammed was compared to the actual son of God? Jesus never raped a 7 year old. If you're saying muhammad didn't exist, are you telling me there was no Aisha? Mohammed wasn't a pedo war lord?
Btw atheists cut heads off too. They just do it without faith in a creator.