Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
The Joint Chiefs of Staff are only a panel of high-ranking U.S. military officers who advise the president of the United States and other civilian leaders on military issues. As an advisory body, the Joint Chiefs of Staff DO NOT LEAD COMBAT FORCES AND HAVE NO EXECUTIVE OR COMMAND AUTHORITY OVER TROOPS IN THEIR SERVICES. iow, military pundits.
The Joint Chiefs are all big wigs I have no doubt they are on the side of the status quo. Why would they want things to drastically change when they are in such comfortable seats of power?
The Joint Chiefs of Staff are only a panel of high-ranking U.S. military officers who advise the president of the United States and other civilian leaders on military issues. As an advisory body, the Joint Chiefs of Staff DO NOT LEAD COMBAT FORCES AND HAVE NO EXECUTIVE OR COMMAND AUTHORITY OVER TROOPS IN THEIR SERVICES. iow, military pundits.
https://www.jcs.mil/About/
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Joint-Chiefs-of-Staff
This explains that letter pretty well: https://youtu.be/pJurFxJR4IE
This one is worth the hour and no way I could do it justice.
No date .. looks fake af
Another take , it’s to assuage mil fears in lefty circles
The Navy website's version has a date.
The Joint Chiefs are all big wigs I have no doubt they are on the side of the status quo. Why would they want things to drastically change when they are in such comfortable seats of power?