64
posted ago by HanginChad ago by HanginChad +64 / -0

What difference did it even make? Why didn't they just say, here's your new president Kamala hand picked by Xi, and you can't do anything about it.

I mean they couldn't have made the fraud more obvious. We all know there's fraud. The courts know there's fraud. The military knows there's fraud and they do nothing.

I don't think anyone would do anything anyway if they skipped the election bullshit, because this couldn't be more obvious.

So why go through all the pretending and play acting?

Comments (28)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
armedprincess23 2 points ago +2 / -0

And for those that say it’s too hard to do that with house elections, ask Sean Parnell. He was leading by 13k with 90% in and lost by 500 two days later. They can rig whatever they want where they control the elections.

1
HanginChad [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

They called Newsom's race when he was losing by 5% with 98% reporting. The GA runoff that just happened. Ron Paul and Bernie. Was it in NY that they found exactly 12 votes that they needed in a drawer somewhere in a congress race?