277
posted ago by The-nii ago by The-nii +280 / -3

When we call people faggots, we don’t mean gay. We are talking about Turtle McConnell, Lindsay Graham (who cares more about being accused gay than he is) and Mittens Romney.

We have the best gays and we don’t care about it.

Comments (83)
sorted by:
36
KaitoBF8 36 points ago +37 / -1

Gay here, honestly surprised this needs to be said lol. I call people faggots too when they deserve it.

16
BonerJam99 16 points ago +17 / -1

Faggot.

21
KaitoBF8 21 points ago +22 / -1

No u.

15
BonerJam99 15 points ago +16 / -1

Shhh! Don’t tell my girlfriend!

3
minotaurbeach 3 points ago +3 / -0

takes one to know one :P

1
BonerJam99 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shhhh. You're a democrat!!! Fagtard! lmao

24
Counterforce1 24 points ago +25 / -1

We have the best gays

9
CDaniel 9 points ago +10 / -1

We have Tremendous Gays, and we love them Bigly.

20
FRENS 20 points ago +21 / -1

Just because you're gay, doesn't mean you're a faggot.
But a lot of gays tend to be faggots. Just keepin' it real.

8
JKillen 8 points ago +9 / -1

Lotta people I know turned out to be faggots. Some of them are even gay.

7
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's okay to be gay. Just don't be a faggot.

4
Excelerator11 4 points ago +5 / -1

Agree

2
esheki808 2 points ago +2 / -0

A lot of non-gays tend to be faggots.

14
Asshat4Congress 14 points ago +14 / -0

The left spent the last decade taking words from us, we are just taking them back

10
deleted 10 points ago +11 / -1
9
Excelerator11 9 points ago +11 / -2

As a gay, don't worry you have a fag pass. I agree with the assessment you have made on those individuals.

8
MrTexas1776 8 points ago +9 / -1

Fo sho. We ain’t discriminating when we say fag. It’s just a fun insult. Say it with me...FAGGOT!! You can be gay and not be a fag. But if you are gay and a fag..I guess that makes you a gay fag

2
esheki808 2 points ago +3 / -1

You can be non-gay and a faggot too. It's about perspective and personality not sexuality.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
1
esheki808 1 point ago +1 / -0

Idc where you put your dick. As long as it's not in kids and you love Freedom and the American way.

6
LindaSarsourCunt 6 points ago +6 / -0

Had a gay roommate years ago, and his words still ring true: "It's okay to be gay, just don't be a faggot."

5
Shilled_due_to_reset 5 points ago +5 / -0

They accept gays in here but no fags allowed!

1
esheki808 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unless they are planefags... 😂

4
guitarmastershredder 4 points ago +11 / -7

I actually have a problem with gays.. I’m sick of their shit being pushed on kids as if it were normal. Sad to see conservatives cuck out and give in to the degeneracy

0
esheki808 0 points ago +1 / -1

I've seen a lot of gays hate that too tho...

-2
The-nii [S] -2 points ago +4 / -6

Why do you care who fucks whom? It happens. Does it affect your life? Yes, I don’t care for gay rights shit. That’s different.

9
guitarmastershredder 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yeah it’s affecting my life... I’m a teacher.. shall I list the thousand forms of degeneracy they want me to normalize?

3
esheki808 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thx for not being a pedo.

2
BonerJam99 2 points ago +4 / -2

Bingo.

We can disagree personally without forcing others to believe what we do. Authoritarianism is a globalist/leftist heresy. Pedes seek liberty for all.

1
KaitoBF8 1 point ago +3 / -2

I hate the term 'gay rights.' If the left were being honest when they use that phrase, it wouldn't be plural. It's just marriage. But that's not what they mean either, it's a scam.

1
Eugene_Beastly 1 point ago +1 / -0

Moral degredation of society. Any acceptance at all leads to more degeneracy.

3
M-m-m-my-corona 3 points ago +3 / -0

Who are the people that are most likely to molest children? Faggots.

3
NPCNN 3 points ago +4 / -1

The only people complaining are the faggot shills who want to stir shit up.

2
esheki808 2 points ago +2 / -0

The REAL faggots.

2
chipitin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Naw, they took their shit too far with wanting little boys to get pumped with estrogen and wear dresses. The level they sexualize kids is fucking disgusting.

They can go back into the closet.

This is the problem with “conservatives” they’re nothing more than liberals from 10 years ago.

In ten years you’re going to be saying “hey tranies we accept you! We support state sponsored transition!”

2
TruthWillBeRevealed 2 points ago +2 / -0

No one cares about sexual orientation. I have a problem with some people pushing that its ok to be gay on to others like theyre trying to recruit people. Children attending pride rallies is disgusting, it should be restricted to 16+

Other than that, go nuts, idgaf.

2
LevonRiver 2 points ago +3 / -1

Why don't you stop fucking apologizing.

2
[email protected] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Never cared. All are welcome if you love Freedom.

2
Kekistan_United 2 points ago +3 / -1

FUCK THOSE FUCKING FAGGOTS -Gay Pedes

2
JKillen 2 points ago +3 / -1

One name.

Rick Grenell

1
thelken 1 point ago +3 / -2

Virtue-signaling has no value here. Knock it off. It's weak behavior.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ColdBrewCovfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

You definitely don’t have to be gay to be a faggot.

1
esheki808 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't gays use that word the most? 😂

1
deeznuts86 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed I don’t think faggot means gays anymore....

1
Censorddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Saying fag or gay is like saying dick or cock or pussy.

We all like pussy. Or cock. Were using it disparagingly sure.

But it's just to call someone out for their bullshit.

I think we could all agree however that using it disparagingly is fine. And doesnt harm dick, cock pussy or cunt.

But without a doubt. All these words should be replaced with Pence.

1
TheAncientGreek 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's the thing that kills me about white Christian nationalists. They bash on based blacks and gays, but are ok with AWFLs. Doesn't make sense. And NO, I'm not PC, I say every word in the bad dictionary.

1
Republic1st 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why did pence go thru class 2x to teach the gay away?

1
CDaniel 1 point ago +1 / -0

if somebody is offended by being called a faggot, thats because he/she is a massive faggot. this is coming from a half faggot

2
Anon1970 2 points ago +2 / -0

Never go full faggot.

2
esheki808 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only faggots get offended at being called a faggot. That's how you know they're faggots. 😂

1
CDaniel 1 point ago +1 / -0

facts and logic right there

1
crash7863 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only a faggot thinks faggot means gay.

I thought we called gays bum diddlers?

1
cryptoconservative 1 point ago +2 / -1

Thank you

1
Vivere_Pericoloso 1 point ago +1 / -0

Faggot can be straight man and woman... I think that common sense..

0
Wexit-Delecto 0 points ago +1 / -1

Correct.

0
systmdcay 0 points ago +1 / -1

doesn't need to be said but its probably nice to hear to the fags out there ;)

0
Callix 0 points ago +1 / -1

We know

0
Super_Comfortable 0 points ago +1 / -1

I’m fine with someone who is gay, but I hate faggots.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-2
Wreckastow -2 points ago +2 / -4

Yeah, good luck with that shit lol.

Try to tell black folks that the confederate flags really shouldn't bug them either, im certain that will go over GREAT.

3
BonerJam99 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nelson W. Winbrush would disagree.

You realize that the Confederacy wasn’t racist right? While the Union was doing shit like Sherman’s General Order. 11 the South had a Jewish Secretary of State (Benjamin Judah). We had a Native American General (Stand Watie), Hispanic regiments (European Brigade, The Spanish Guards, Benavides Regiment), etc.

3
Wreckastow 3 points ago +4 / -1

You argue with prager U for me, cheers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcy7qV-BGF4

2
BonerJam99 2 points ago +2 / -0

Working on it. Lots to unpack here as I see you’ve been blue pulled more than you know. I’ll post back in a bit with a full response.

1
BonerJam99 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok. Let's dissect a few of these claims:

  1. Many people don't want to believe that the citizens of the Southern states were willing to fight and die to preserve a morally repugnant institution.

So far from engaging in a war to perpetuate slavery, I am rejoiced that Slavery is abolished. I believe it will be greatly for the interest of the South. So fully am I satisfied of this that I would have cheerfully lost all that I have lost by the war, and have suffered all that I have suffered to have this object attained. – General Robert E. Lee

I want to elevate you to take positions in law offices, in stores, on farms, and wherever you are capable of going. I have not said anything about politics today. I don’t propose to say anything about politics. You have a right to elect whom you please; vote for the man you think best, and I think, when that is done, you and I are freemen. Do as you consider right and honest in electing men for office. I did not come here to make you a long speech, although invited to do so by you. I am not much of a speaker, and my business prevented me from preparing myself. I came to meet you as friends, and welcome you to the white people. I want you to come nearer to us. When I can serve you I will do so. We have but one flag, one country; let us stand together. We may differ in color, but not in sentiment. Many things have been said about me which are wrong, and which white and black persons here, who stood by me through the war, can contradict. Go to work, be industrious, live honestly and act truly, and when you are oppressed I’ll come to your relief. I thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for this opportunity you have afforded me to be with you, and to assure you that I am with you in heart and in hand. – General Nathaniel Bedford Forrest

  1. The South fought to "Preserve the Peculiar institution of slavery". First this is a rewording of the previous point which is lame but let's play ball:

The South seceded as they had irreparable political differences

Secession belongs to a different class of remedies. It is to be justified upon the basis that the States are Sovereign. There was a time when none denied it. I hope the time may come again, when a better comprehension of the theory of our Government, and the inalienable rights of the people of the States, will prevent any one from denying that each State is a Sovereign, and thus may reclaim the grants which it has made to any agent whomsoever. – Jefferson Davis

“Union among ourselves is not only necessary for our safety, but for the preservation of the common liberties and institutions of the whole confederacy. We constitute the balance wheel of our complex and beautiful political system. We are, and must continue to be, in a permanent minority in the Union. Our geographical position, our industry, pursuits, and institutions, are all peculiar. Our safety and prosperity depend on maintaining, in their full vigor, the restrictions imposed on the powers granted by the Constitution. So long as these are so maintained, and the powers confined to the objects intended by that sacred compact, we will be safe and prosperous, but no longer. There is no fear, but the stronger portions of the Union will maintain the powers in their full vigor. The limitations are of far less comparative value to them. They can protect themselves without them; and, in fact, so far from a benefit, they are but too apt to regard them as unnecessary restraints on their power. If we do not take care of them, none will, and the government will practicably become one of unlimited powers.” John C. Calhoun

Was Alexander Stephen's speech racist as hell? Sure but before we assume he speaks for the Confederacy lets compare the Confederate VP to President Lincoln.

Our republican system was meant for a homogeneous people. As long as blacks continue to live with the whites they constitute a threat to the national life. Family life may also collapse and the increase of mixed breed bastards may some day challenge the supremacy of the white man.

In regards to the Emancipation Proclamation; lets look at the text:

the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free

Wait... what about the slaves in Kentucky? Delaware? Maryland? Missouri? Oh yeah! They kept slaves because they were not in Confederate states. The Emancipation Proclamation only effected states which seceded and as they did not acknowledge Lincoln this had no teeth. The E.P. was a political gesture to distract from the draft riots rather than a meaningful sentiment.

Now Colonel Todd talks about positive statistics. Does he mention the following:

Ok. That's enough effort for a reply that will probably be seen by less than 5 people.

Todd Siedule is a leftist from NY and quite biased. Feel free to let him know I'll gladly own his ass if he ever wants to try and talk history though.

2
Wreckastow 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have to say I feel this is an unwinnable argument and one I would be excessively careful (EVEN MORE CAREFUL THAN THAT) in ever bringing up in real life under any circumstances whatsoever.

And make sure you cant be doxxed if you insist on doing it online too lol.

I do not know that Siedule fella but hey, send him an email, maybe he will do an online debate with ya (WHICH I SUGGEST U DO NOT DO LOL)

Good luck

1
BonerJam99 1 point ago +1 / -0

Siedule (if I’m spelling it right) is the guy in the video from PragerU. You are totally right that it’s an unsinkable battle but it’s something that pisses me off royally.

The history is far more complex than simple racial divides. Compare for example to the people claiming MAGA = white supremacist.

Really my point in engaging is that I see this as a past example of what they are doing to us today. Yankees have a rather limited view of the facts and in a few generations we rush everyone thinking that Pedes were basically Nazis.

We must reclaim impartial truth or else we are all screwed.

1
Wreckastow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yankees have a rather limited view of the facts.. LOLOLOL...

Yeah, all those learned southerns LOLOLOL

Ok man good luck with the fight that I TOTALLY think you shouldn't fight.

1
BonerJam99 1 point ago +1 / -0

Brother, you are making statements without supporting them. I backed up my points with citations. Do you have anything to back yourself up or are these your own views?

2
Mikon 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have friends with their confederate flags. Doesn’t really bother me all that much. Unless I see you walking down the street in a white hood carrying that flag or something we good lol

1
JKillen 1 point ago +1 / -0

White hood white hood...

O-k-k-k 🎶

No for real a white hood would be a little much. Okay bro...we get it...you really trying to let ppl know you don't GAF..

Ya can't come to my bbq with that on..

0
Wreckastow 0 points ago +1 / -1

Well im sure some gay folks don't care when we use the word fag.

BUT, I suspect a lot more do. Same basic concept.

0
Mikon 0 points ago +1 / -1

I used to use the word a lot but I use it sparingly now since I know how I’d feel if some rando called me the n word

1
JKillen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tell that to the black gay Pede flying a rainbow confederate flag at the Trump Waives here in Orlando.

He's proud of his great grandfather being a civil war officer.

We don't tell him he can't.. 🦅✌

0
Wreckastow 0 points ago +1 / -1

Is that one guy representative of every black person in the US?

Is the white guy with the Aushwitz shirt representative of every white person in the US?