The general counsel for their companies sitting right there if they have to intervene and those long drawn-out windy time-wasting responses mentioning feelings a lot (ie something incredibly unmeasurable and non-specific ) which could have been a 'yes' or 'no'?
I haven't heard suggestions it was not under oath until now.. only a lot of frustration that the questions were too soft.
That’s the thing, I thought they were never under oath when in front of Congress and it was a dog and pony show
The general counsel for their companies sitting right there if they have to intervene and those long drawn-out windy time-wasting responses mentioning feelings a lot (ie something incredibly unmeasurable and non-specific ) which could have been a 'yes' or 'no'?
I haven't heard suggestions it was not under oath until now.. only a lot of frustration that the questions were too soft.