4158
Another reason to love RSBN (media.thedonald.win) ⚠️ HIGH ENERGY⚠️
posted ago by DidSantiagoSendYou +4158 / -0
Comments (75)
sorted by:
70
grumpoh 70 points ago +71 / -1

Would cost them too much to do subtitles for.. you know.. the thing.

9
ColonelTravis 9 points ago +9 / -0

They would need the Messiah of closed captioning, to pull that off.

2
PatriotChang 2 points ago +2 / -0

The people closed captioning it would need some serious badakapcare after their workday.

1
CosaNostra 1 point ago +1 / -0

What do you think, huh? Are you a junkie? C'mon man!

28
Jane 28 points ago +28 / -0

Trump will always be the subject to cover.

1
TheWinningNeverStops 1 point ago +1 / -0

Till the end of time and the heat death of the universe.

22
deleted 22 points ago +23 / -1
17
Tacoboutit 17 points ago +17 / -0

Who are you kidding, they have 4 years of Trump wins to replay that too many people still haven't seen.

15
happyfave 15 points ago +15 / -0

Why waste their time... Nobody is going to watch that shit.

11
Lusec 11 points ago +11 / -0

They wouldn't get any views. It would cost them money.

1
USRifle_Cal30M1 1 point ago +1 / -0

When has costing them money been an issue to the gov?

5
Lusec 5 points ago +5 / -0

I mean RSBN wouldn't make any money because they would get no views.

10
AmericaWillSurvive 10 points ago +10 / -0

They should record his speeches, not air them live, and then edit them out of context like CNN/MSM does with Trump.

1
lucifer_fit_deus 1 point ago +1 / -0

The thing is they wouldn’t have to edit them out of context.

Biden is a total mess.

1
BlackLivesMurder 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes

6
jubyeonin 6 points ago +8 / -2

What's their plan now? They don't have a subject to cover.

7
Mad_Maximo 7 points ago +7 / -0

Likely the unrest that MSM won't.

4
bobobob 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't think Trump is just going to go away

5
independentbystander 5 points ago +5 / -0

LOL! MSM won't show them either, they don't want to make him look bad! They will just keep up the usual heavily-edited cherrypicked soundbites (before he goes off gaffing in some odd direction.)

2
fdagasfd 2 points ago +2 / -0

They also want anybody at all to watch. LOL!

4
BallsackPaneer 4 points ago +4 / -0

They should record, but not carry. Accountability is key when faced with big-tech memory-holing.

2
lucifer_fit_deus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Excellent point. MSM will most assuredly “massage” any misstatements.

3
bewarethejogger 3 points ago +3 / -0

From the viewing stats, nobody watches them anyways.

He pretty much just mumbles and stammers angrily until they cart him off the stage or he bites his wife's finger.

3
BDME 3 points ago +3 / -0

can we cover them but overlay a clown face and just close caption jibberish?

2
PhD_in_everything 2 points ago +2 / -0

*ramblings

2
fdagasfd 2 points ago +2 / -0

They just lost 10-15 Democrats!

2
WeWonByALOT-1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

Top kek

2
meme_oil 2 points ago +2 / -0

so thats it then. everyone plans on bending over and smiling! although i predicted this im not happy about it.

2
Mooma 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

Smart business decision, why waste resources on events that nobody will watch. (Unless you are the fakenews media who gets bribed to carry unprofitable events)

2
Thomas1963-1967 2 points ago +2 / -0

Isn't RSBN hosted on YouTube? If so, what are the odds of them getting shut down at the whim of Google?

3
67Vert 3 points ago +3 / -0

They need to start mirroring on another platform like Rumble. If Rumble can handle it

2
BigDaddyBigTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good. They should only carry speeches from the president.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
stonepony 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who would watch?

PS Biden isn't going to be POTUS regardless of what happens. It's Kamala, always was.

1
Overkillengine 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd ask them to reconsider otherwise it leaves documentation of the shit Biden says in other people's hands for them memory hole anything inconvenient.

1
ZhouBai-Den 1 point ago +1 / -0

"But they have to! Bake the cake! REEEEEEE!!!!"

(But Trump still can't be on Twitter.)

1
rangoon03 1 point ago +1 / -0

C'mon man, where else can I watch them then?!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Scankles 1 point ago +1 / -0

Censorship! For the 8 years of the Dog-Eater's Reign of Error, I only looked at memes and places like AoSHQ where we could laugh at the Commie bastard.

1
Nalgahyde 1 point ago +1 / -0

Carrying Joe Biden speeches is akin to dead air so it makes no sense airing them.

1
Thathurtsmyfeelings1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everytime Biden has a speech, they should do a Trump speech where he debunks everything that Biden says.

1
LameNRG 1 point ago +1 / -0

We should start LSBN and cover all of Joe’s speeches, and sprinkle facts and truth in the stream.

1
gbolcer 1 point ago +1 / -0

He can speak??

1
JediDwag 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's RSBN tweeting. Using Trump's picture as a profile picture is a thing to protest his ban.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Guildpro101 1 point ago +1 / -0

They should cover them with live commentary debunking him with sources. We would be foolish to let the oppisition out of our sight. Now more than ever we need to be vigilant.

1
OfficerNasty 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would they bother? They'd only get like 20 viewers.

1
KekMasterYoda 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry folks, we're all out of corn pop.

1
thunderpussy 1 point ago +1 / -0

They don't believe in spreading CCP propaganda.

Good for them!

1
crackerclown 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah well, they'd probably end up losing viewers because that moron can't even string a sentence together without constantly saying "excuse me" and coughing because he has forgotten his script.

1
AtrisFlex 1 point ago +1 / -0

They could carry them and commentate over the entire thing, or do like a mystery science theater. That would be fun.

1
MeatShield72 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good. There is no need. EVERY. SINGLE. OTHER. PLATFORM. and NETWORK will have them.

1
Jack_Jack 1 point ago +1 / -0

They should cover them and fact check him in real time while running a counter in the corner on Sniffy’s lies, half truths, and senior moments.

1
LostSailor 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. The viewers wouldn't understand anyways. It's impossible to even try and grasp what an alzheimer's patient is saying anyways so the rsbn would have to have a dog/pony show afterwards just getting clarification on what he said vs what he meant.

1
MaxItout 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would PAY Money to watch news the does not let me Hear Joe's Voice.

1
Kvoth 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are still on Twitter. Fucking clueless.

1
MAGASquatch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hey man! That's Trunalimunumaprzure!

Trunalimunumaprzure

1
talkingprimate 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because there won't be any?

1
IvIA6A 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bo Jiden going to be so pumped full of drugs to get through his inauguration, he's going to crash for a week.

1
TheWinningNeverStops 1 point ago +1 / -0

Illegitimate president. Why cover his speeches? lol

1
bothloveocean 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would they. Only the commie press shows up anyway to reinforce their retarded echo chamber of deceit.

1
Unet0xNullPtr 1 point ago +1 / -0

Idk what carry means specifically but if it does mean what I think it means, then ehhh ill just skip RSBN..

1
Danmax67 1 point ago +1 / -0

But how will I get to see fresh coverage if him sniffing and groping children?

1
MythArcana 1 point ago +1 / -0

An old dementia patient rambling in gibberish won't draw many viewers.