Democrats on the intelligence committee fucking Chinese spys.
Hunter selling influence in China and Ukraine.
"The big guy" getting 10%.
Whistleblowers explaining how Joe was a part of all CCP deals.
Joe admitting blackmailing Ukraine.
Hunter fucking kids.
Clinton fucking kids ("We got them!").
Thousands of illegal voters.
Thousands of dead voters.
Thousands of non-resident and double voters identified.
Thousands of votes switched.
Complete statistical impossibilities of Bidens victory.
Pictures of boarded up windows stopping observers.
Evidence of shredded ballots.
Actual video evidence of people taking cases of Ballots out from hidden under a table.
Video evidence of people scanning ballots multiple times.
Hundreds of affidavits and witnesses.
Video evidence of homeless being paid to vote democrat.
Voting machines connected to the networks and provenly easily hackable.
Strong evidence of foreign interference.
Massively high percentage of adjudicated votes revealed.
I could go on forever. Every single one of these would be a huge bombshell Watergate if it was about Trump.
So we are supposed to say "Bravo" they were better criminals than we were at stealing the election?
Where is the point-by-point refutation of the OP's summary coming from a court-of-law? (Which BTW is all we are asking for -- for example, what is the explanation for 5 key states stopping counting at the same time?)
Ok, I will ask again more specifically: where is point-by-point refutation of the OP's summary coming from a state court? Seriously, I am open minded and do want to read it, if it exists.
(Please I'm not that interested in re-reading a wall of text you copy-pasted from other posts you made).
So you believe that we should have more faith in law enforcement and the justice system, because, for example, a more plausible explanation for spying on Trump in 2016-2017, and the Mueller investigation is, though there was never any plausible evidence, Trump had incompetent people around him?
Do you have factual information that refutes the OP?
"So whatever the state supreme courts have released, that's what you get." OK, so have you read anything factual from the state supreme courts that refutes the OP? I would genuinely like to read that.
I get your hypothetical point about how the system is supposed to work. I get your opinion about maybe Trump was actually incompetent this whole time.
Do you have any facts that refute the OP? That is really the main thing the Patriots seek. Instead, the MSM pushes it all in the memory-hole with "baseless", "no evidence" and now direct assaults on the 1A.