Not at all. As far as I know from my limited knowledge none of the perpetrators of the fraud have yet to stand in court charged with not following / observing the procedural rules enacted by their legislatures. Perhaps we need a (large) lawfare fund to go after them. Proving failure to follow the law should be easier than proving fraud, but doing so provides a foot hold to proving fraud in subsequent cases.
While we should work that angle as well I think we should be filling the ranks of poll watchers and poll managers from here on out. If nothing else we need to block the steal
No: must insist and ensure the laws are enforced. If we can't sue to cure the vote then sue to punish the offenders.
Right but that battle has been fought and lost already. Has it not?
Not at all. As far as I know from my limited knowledge none of the perpetrators of the fraud have yet to stand in court charged with not following / observing the procedural rules enacted by their legislatures. Perhaps we need a (large) lawfare fund to go after them. Proving failure to follow the law should be easier than proving fraud, but doing so provides a foot hold to proving fraud in subsequent cases.
While we should work that angle as well I think we should be filling the ranks of poll watchers and poll managers from here on out. If nothing else we need to block the steal