posted ago by mynameisnobody
+5608 / -1
Trying to scare/bully Congress to agree to a ten-day audit so the country can trust the election outcome is literally the opposite of an insurrection. It would be more accurate to say Congress was the insurrection and the mob tried, and failed, to force a transparent election.
Trying to scare/bully Congress to agree to a ten-day audit so the country can trust the election outcome is literally the opposite of an insurrection. It would be more accurate to say Congress was the insurrection and the mob tried, and failed, to force a transparent election.
The evidence is not going away, and we are not going away.
What dod that lady tell Schumer ‘I didn’t think the Trumpers had it in them!’
Secede now!
drumroll.gif
Bahdumpbump.tsh
Pure thought crime from Scott adams. The kind DEMOCRATS HATE
Honk honk
Well in clown world we have some elections without a paper trail. You think by now someone with, like a cloth, has wiped things??
Still have affidavits and witnesses to get the ball rolling
Exactly right, Congress committed the crime, along with Dominion/Smartmatic, ect. Remember Ashli Babbit, she, and others, bled, and died, so we could possibly have a future. And how was she and others remembered? Defamed, slandered and lied about, even Trump would not call her name out.
Always remember, the United States of America is our nation, WE are America, the people, not Congress, they are supposed to SERVE us, as PUBLIC SERVANTS. Our Founding Fathers knew this.
They derive their power from the consent of the governed. I do not consent. Let there be peace, let there be freedom. I’ve never felt more patriotic than I do right now, standing next to each and everyone of you against this tyranny. In fact, I thank the Lord that we have been given this moment in time, that we may experience our brothers and sisters patriotic love. 🇺🇸🙏 We truly stand together.
Right on!! Fuck the fraudulent Biden administration right in the ass!
They're trying to eliminate the EC so they are in power forever. These servants need to be reminded of their place.
They’re already in power forever. They aren’t going to fix the election process that allowed them to cheat their way to power. They aren’t going to prevent massive MSM propaganda campaigns for their people. They aren’t going to stop social media censorship and interference on their behalf.
They are going to give 30 million illegals the vote, make overwhelmingly Dem Puerto Rico and DC into states, open the border, and at least try to criminalize opposition.
All these things might not go the way they think. All those Puerto Rican’s going to Florida did not vote blue. Trump has an even bigger appeal to immigrants even with media slander. The way the Dems are going after wrongthink it’s only a matter of time before they will eventually turn on their own and might splinter their base even further. Trust me I’m blackpilled and not looking forward to re-education camps but they are lazy and sloppy and God hasn’t totally abandoned us.
GITMO.
Have a goddamn upvote for that idea.
an illegitimate government needs the protection of a standing army paid by the government. which is why it is forbidden by the constitution.
That would be the 1A way to do it.
What comes after 1A? 1B?
2A.
2A (2nd Amendment)
Because the 'evidence' is probably just comparison spreadsheets. With personally identifiable information in it, so can't be shared. If that doesn't hold up to expectations, the next step would be digging into the underlying software performing that comparison (I'm going to guess excel). And besides asking proving that there was no fraud is an impossible - you can't prove a negative
Giving the evidence its day in court is not asking them to prove the absence of fraud. And if you’ve watched any of the hours of evidence presented before various state legislatures you know it’s not spreadsheets full of personal data.
Italygate tho
I'm glad that Scott is still willing to speak the truth despite big tech's ruthless crackdown on wrongthink.
Who would have thought that out of all the conservative voices, Scott Adam’s would have the best take. He’s right up there with Limbaugh in beating everyone to the punch.
He takes every side. Also, he is fucking rich and invests in these companies, and he has friends and fans in them. He’s safe.
Last I heard, Scott doesn't even consider himself a conservative. He's always identified as apolitical. He just calls things like he sees them.
Adams has stated that he himself likes policies that are economically to the left of Trump (Medicare for all, free college, etc.), but that he is still a big fan of Trump.
He's said 100 times "I'm to the left of Bernie."
He's said that he's to the left of Bernie, but that he actually understands economics and realizes that there's better way to get the good things that leftists want (better healthcare, housing, education, a clean environment, etc)
Think he’s even said he’s more left than Bernie on social issues or something but still pretty much supports trump
The primary tool for oppression right now is economic. Cancel culture can destroy your livelyhood. They aren't arresting us outright yet.
Independently wealthy people are in the best position to openly dissent because they don't become homeless if you get the fired.
There are two groups left with true freedom: those who can stand entirely on their own, and those with nothing left to lose.
not
The Presidents speech that day was worded very carefully to say this while sounding like he condemned the protests
An audit, a full and transparent audit, not a bullshit one, would have ended the debate. It would have put this to rest. The more they fight the effort to get at the truth, the more people are convinced the vote fraud is real and the steal happened.
An audit by definitition is a sampling. That is not what I want.
I want a full recount with checks to make sure each and every vote is legal.
A forensic audit is a real check to the nitty-gritty of exactly what votes are legit (100% I believe either after a sampling or from the get-go.)
A recount could merely recount fraudulent votes for the umpteenth time.
That's false. Only a specific, new sort of auditing uses samples and then extrapolates from there (the "risk limiting audit"). Ironically I believe it greatly increases the chances of fraud since the production of the sample seems to be opaque and in control of the very election officials that are implicated in the charges.
When we say 'audit,' we mean of every damn county, and especially those with big red flags like pure democratic control, kicking out of observers, and late-night dumps of insane margin mail-in ballots.
This exactly highlights the issue with using the word audit when asking for what we want. We have an ambiguity here which leads to miscommunication.
There seems to be a specific definition that you are referring to from election law versus a general meaning from accountimg, law, government, etc.
This is problematic when dealing with politicians that twist words to suit their purpose.
For example, in Georgia, Kemp ordered an audit as the voters were demanding. It used a sampling as I described and amounted to nothing but a show.
We need to be more specific in our request. Otherwise, we get frustrated when we do not get what we think we are asking for when it is interpreted in a different way.
I have not thought about what we should call it, but political consultants should be thinking about this problem for the future.
"full" or "complete" or "comprehensive" might be enough if added to "audit"
Maybe that is the path forward. "Complete and full accounting" is better than audit.
And can't follow this guy's reasoning. On the one hand, he says that the demonstration was an appropriate response to the situation. On the other, he's saying that Trump 'should have known' that a demonstration might turn violent - and therefor not have called for it.
The two aren't opposed if you assume he's saying we're reaching the point where violence is an acceptable solution. I'm not saying it is, but that could be what he's implying.
Yeah this. The key to watching/listening to Scott Adams is he's very much a stoic. Whether or not he sees himself as that is another story.
I also consider him "King of the Normies", because he's generally a good barometer for how normies are feeling about the various events, just with a calmer and more analytical mind. I consider this a good thing. As an example: he doesn't seem to be fully bought in that the elections were fraudulent, but thinks it's suspect that the lady doth protest too much and whatnot.
He 100% believes the elections were fraudulent and says so regularly. He uses the ice cream on the sidewalk example. If you drop ice cream on a hot side walk, then walk away and someone asks you if the ice cream melted, you can say with 100% certainty that it did, even though you never actually saw it melt.
Same thing with the election fraud. If you have a system where there is a huge upside to cheating and the chances of getting caught cheating are extremely low, fraud will happen 100% of the time.
The thing he questions is whether the system will ever care enough about the fraud to actually do something. The answer of course is no. Our politicians who created the system are useless.
He also accepts every Dem denial of fraud. Every piece of evidence of fraud is immediately denied by the Dems, without evidence, and that’s good enough for him.
Court cases don’t need ironclad evidence, just enough to convince a judge.
He's fully bought into it being fraudulent. Just not convinced the outcome can be changed
He’s said the outcome should not be changed regardless of fraud because that would make the Dems mad and they loot, riot, burn, beat, and kill when they’re mad.
i WISH he was king of the normies, my family thinks he's a "not see" :(
To paraphrase MAGA peoples' expectations of Scott Adams in his own words,
"If you invite a cartoonist to share a foxhole with you, you're crazy!"
Very clever insights but he doesn't want to have any of his opinions nailed into the wall. The closer events approach a tipping point he will veer away from the main points.
That said, I wouldn't mind sharing a foxhole with him. But that's because I was an art major who works in tech (yeah, I know) and I imagine we'd have a lot of fascinating conversations and arguments.
insurrection [ in-suh-rek-shuhn ]
noun an act or instance of rising in revolt, rebellion, or resistance against civil authority or an established government.
Civil Authority = An Honest Election
Resisting audits of the election is insurrection, committed by demoKKKrats and corrupt Republicans in Georgia.
A fraudulent elected government is not an established government. It is an illegal government. Therefore, you cannot form an insurrection against an illegal government.
The insurrection was the election fraud. Election fraud is resistance to the civilian authority governing legal elections. This insurrection included illegal actions by officials and governors and courts in illegal disregard for state legislature rules on how state elections shall be conducted.
America is occupied territory.
😍
The people in Congress have been slaves to cash for so long please quit thinking that they’re representing you because they are not they are representing themselves!
Scott is flip flopping all over the place, I think he has cognitive dissonance. Two videos ago he said the people going into the Capitol were doing the most American of things. Last video he said those participating in the riots should be executed (seeming to blur people outside not knowing what was going on, and people taking the Capitol tour, and Provocateurs leading the incursion). Now he says it is the opposite of an insurrection.
He Tweeted basically that Ashli deserved to die on the day of or morning after, to howls of rage from a lot of people.
Scott is not now, never has been, nor ever will be a friend to America First. He is a conniver, he tells you this as he's doing it, and unfortunately many of our friends are fooled by him anyway.
You get one shot at the king and if you miss...welp
Does he still have a twitter account or did he post this somewhere else?
Didn't this cuck shit on us last week?
Wouldn’t surprise me.
I stopped paying him any attention when he said the Supreme Court should ignore election fraud and give in to the Dems because they would get violent again if they didn’t get what they want.
One way to say that the protesters weren't about that life
I want the southern states to quite the union. It is about time. This way the blue States can deal with all the debt.
These scumbags have no answers to any of the evidence provided, absolutely nothing. They know the cheating was exposed but simply shield themselves with "process" so nothing will be done. This must never be forgotten.
Watch Scott every morning at 10am est live at https://www.youtube.com/c/RealCoffeewithScottAdams
Dang, Scott!
Shhhh!
We don't want them to know this.
Congress and the media are guilty of treason and aiding the hostile take over of American.
Seems like the globalists would love to fracture America. You have a clearly fraudulent election that they won’t even address. Then they call you an insurrectionist. How many of these scoundrels have called to hunting down Trump supporters.
www.hereistheevidence.com
THIS. THANK YOU MISTER ADAMS.
So true!!!
No one wanted to "overturn" an election. Only to verify that the actual winner takes office.
Scott Adams is a plant. He fully bought the corona hoax and pushes vaccines. He has praised Bill Gates multiple times.
If only media would report the truth
Zing
This is the correct assessment
We’re getting Alinsky’d again. Projection.
Hopefully, someday soon, we'll finally get our chance to really show what happened in the election with people seeking to listen.
Based Dilbert merchant
Obvious. I'm sure CNN is adjusting its narrative as we speak.
Finally you are getting it, Mr. Expert Psychologist.
This
Please link to the source?
What took him so long?
He has been saying this since before anyone else.
OK. I don’t follow him regularly, and got really annoyed by his justifying Ashli Babbitt’s shooting. He needs to spend time with some knowledgable gun nuts and learn more about that part of the world, because he came off as ignorant on that subject.
But glad to hear he’s been consistent on this.
Done with Scott Adams. He is controlled.
Plz stop giving this cuck any views. He's not pro trump he's a grifter.
You don’t actually watch him if you don’t think he is pro-Trump.
For real. He was like one of the first mainstream Trump supporters and lost all his live public speaking engagements because of it. Dude is legit.
He flipflops nonstop like a total schizoid.
I had to stop watching when he accepted each and every Dem denial of fraud without question. Didn’t matter that each denial was without any evidence, he just accepted it. He finally stopped waiting for them to say "No, that’s debunked" and just made up excuses for them.
He seemed to think a videotaped confession from top Dems would be necessary.
Exactly. He rode with Trump to the top then when things got hard backpedaled like the coward he is.
He says the exact opposite. He says that a claim + a debunk = nothing. He says you have to actually look into the claim and the debunk in order to know anything. And he criticizes the media for refusing to do so.