Go find a mirror upload of Tim Pools videos and just tally all the contradicting viewpoints he has.

Centrists come in two forms. There the first kind who believe that solutions to arguments lie in the middle. So to this centrist with absolute power, if say a proposal to spend 10 million to build a new bridge came up and one side wanted it and another didn't, the centrist would decide that some money (up to 5 million) would be spent. This of course solves nothing as both sides are angry. One side gets a really shitty bridge instead of a good one and the other is pissed any money was even spent.

Variant 2 of the centrist is the zero sum centrists. They believe that if a positive thing happens to one side, a positive thing of equal importance should happen to the other. And the same for negative things. This Of course is no way measurable or enforceable. It also leads for collosal swings of power each way, but that's okay as long as both sides can do it.