800
Comments (24)
sorted by:
18
jackasskicker 18 points ago +18 / -0

Facebook is propped up by artificial numbers, at this point it's a glorified money laundering network.

6
mintscape 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think Twitter badly fake their numbers also.

4
540k-Again 4 points ago +4 / -0

All bad big tech is like ENRON, enforce the basic laws like: lawful SEC filings, anti-espionage & pricefixing, and the Chi-comm valley house of cards comes tumbling down.

4
doodaddy 4 points ago +4 / -0

"They're making a catastrophic mistake." -- Our President.

10
AmazinKrackin 10 points ago +10 / -0

The thing is about these tech giants is that you don't need them to survive. Once we figure that out they go bankrupt. Maybe this is a wakeup call to go back to old school living, off of the screens, back to engagement with life and people. MSM is done for most people and now we turn to the worthless apps and screens. TDW is pretty much it and Officer Tatum, Candace Owens and a few others.

1
HockeyMom4Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agree. We survived for years without Facebook or Twitter. Somehow, we got the news. We knew what was going on with family members. We figured out the score of the game.

What is the point of Facebook? Do I really care to see a picture of what an old classmate I rarely spoke to had for lunch? Do I need Twitter? Most people with Twitter don't even need it.

So happy I never wasted time on either of these sites. I would cancel, but I can't cancel what I never signed up for in the first place,

6
shatmaself 6 points ago +6 / -0

The new WhatsApp terms isn't helping either. People are dumping WhatsApp.

2
mintscape 2 points ago +2 / -0

You would have to be extremely low IQ to keep WhatsApp after the new terms of service.

1
Scumbag-reddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can you enlighten someone who never used it what changed in their terms?

1
mintscape 1 point ago +1 / -0

WhatsApp used to be a paid for service long ago, it cost $1 and it was free from ads and spying, then Facebook bought it, it got ads but became free although it tracked you and monitored your messages. Recently Facebook has changed the terms to allow them to bundle all your Whatsapp data with your Facebook's data.

They already do this with Instagram data.

Think about what this means: Facebook has profiles on people with all your Facebook data, your photos and messages. An absolute wet dream for those that wish to control you.

They sell those profiles on people to China as well as our own intelligence agencies plus mega corporations.

2
mintscape 2 points ago +2 / -0

You would have to be extremely low IQ to keep WhatsApp after the new terms of service.

5
2020_Vision 5 points ago +5 / -0

34 Billion to help small businesses instead

4
ronaldcamillo123 4 points ago +4 / -0

Part of the deal with the Dems. Help Dems win, we will protect your monopolies, but you must help us win and destroy trump when we do.

That’s why Kamala, she’s connected to Silicon Valley. Silicon Valley said okay, but give us Kamala as VP, soon to be president. She will protect tech through all of this. Protecting tech will be the democrat party marching orders over the next four years, at least.

1
mintscape 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is also something I have thought about too, it seems the mostly likely explanation.

How big tech and the media acted in coordination to censor the New York Post story before the election was so very revealing.

What the hell happened to America, it's so sad.

1
Jaybone86 1 point ago +1 / -0

And behind that protect China.

4
sedative84 4 points ago +4 / -0

good. Hopefully they lose everything and Cuckerberg gets exposed for being an actual android from the Alpha Centauri star system

3
NPC11011110000 3 points ago +3 / -0

CIA will just beg Biden for $34 billion for "Administrative Fees". Don't worry, Zuck. We got your back!

3
Unapologetic 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wish i would have bought more puts

2
sedative84 2 points ago +2 / -0

sell calls. get that positive theta decay

1
Unapologetic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ahh! Keep the money at opex! I need to do better.

1
Olds77 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have no idea if China or one of Facebook's wealthy backers will backstop them. I wouldn't expose yourself to such tremendous risk.

3
mintscape 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wait till the law suits start and even with the corrupt judiciary, there is a chance that Parler might get a judge that is not corrupt, in which case they will win huge damages.

If the judiciary was not corrupt, no way would Amazon, Twitter, Apple and Google pull their monopolist shit and blatantly try to destroy a solid business just because they were better than the incumbents.

What a corrupt world we have.

2
Fizbin7 2 points ago +2 / -0

ha ha ha ha.

No seriously, still 98% too high.

1
doodaddy 1 point ago +2 / -1

I remember a few years into the Obama admin when Google CEO Eric Shmidt, and later Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos went to visit the White House.

At the time I thought they were going to peddle influence and pay bribes. Now that I'm a little older and wiser, I think that they were summoned by the mafia head (Obama) and made an offer they couldn't refuse.