You don't need to, you literally just need one general with loyalists to take out a few higherups and assume the role of commander a la every military revolution that ever took place. It's never been about beating the military it's about being in the military and then taking out the 1-2 people above you.
I'm not familiar with military terms, general was just my way of saying top leader. Look through history: Russia, Rome, plenty of generals took nations by themselves with the army. Army is critical to everything.
I know, but you're going into a semantic argument that's not relevant. I'm referring to the person who is senior in their day to day command not their entire oversight.
You don't need to, you literally just need one general with loyalists to take out a few higherups and assume the role of commander a la every military revolution that ever took place. It's never been about beating the military it's about being in the military and then taking out the 1-2 people above you.
How many Generals do you think are in the US Military? 1 General with a few loyalists isn’t shit. Take out a few higher ups? You mean a few dozen.
I'm not familiar with military terms, general was just my way of saying top leader. Look through history: Russia, Rome, plenty of generals took nations by themselves with the army. Army is critical to everything.
The top leader of the US military is the President.
I know, but you're going into a semantic argument that's not relevant. I'm referring to the person who is senior in their day to day command not their entire oversight.