94
posted ago by italianorose ago by italianorose +95 / -1

Trump has already signed the insurrection act on Wednesday January 6, 2021. He did so after his tweet telling everybody to go home in peace. That tweet was deleted by Twitter (his proof of insurrection act).

The Joint Chief of Staff memo is fake. It’s not on the JCS website or their Twitter. It would have been on those websites If it were legit. I don’t care who has it on their website, you have to go straight to the source. What do you guys always say, I only trust Trump. Well only trust the source.

They are scrambling to impeach trump. He is not a threat, it’s because they know Trump had a military operation on the 6th to take pelosis laptop. We were there for a distraction. “Be there, will be wild”.

Trump hasn’t conceded either.

Also, 20,000 troops in DC. Makes no sense for a virtual inauguration.

Also, blackouts in Iran, Italy, Germany, and Pakistan. All at once? Doesn’t add up and is not coincidence.

Don’t come here to doom. I have faith in Trump.

Comments (42)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
scyenceFiction 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is one other little thing that bugged me about that memo. Again, it's something that would only be noticed by someone dealing with real correspondence.

All the signatures are in blue ink.

That is never done, and in practice, prohibited by Army Regulation. Black ink only on official correspondence.

There is no date, but that is common when the memorandum for record is in DRAFT status.

My theory? This is a DRAFT.

It's not uncommon for Headquarters to create two versions of a document, complete with signatures, before handing both to their admin assistant to stamp a date and submit the correct one, when the outcome of something (like appointment of a new elected official) is still in question at draft time.

I'm betting there is a corollary to this letter out there as well. Still in DRAFT status.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
scyenceFiction 1 point ago +1 / -0

True dat, but again, I still suspect this is one of a pair of letters.

Why do we only see this one? Well, I'm a realist too. Take it at face value.

But it does give air cover for the JCS in case it's more bullshit misdirection or misinformation.