14
Comments (8)
sorted by:
3
RlzJohnnyM 3 points ago +3 / -0

80 Million people disfranchised and silenced

No buildings were burned down

No one in Congress was shot or killed

Violence?

NO!

FALSE FLAG

GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK

1
1GodisGr8 1 point ago +3 / -2

We're not " ATTACKING " anything

What's about to happen is PURE SELF DEFENSE

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
kwqt [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's exactly how ANTIFA people speak before they go to their "riots". Maybe sit down and think for a while. Then come back with a more positive attitude.

-1
Imyurhuckleberry -1 points ago +1 / -2

There is no movement anymore because you listened to Yes Men your entire reelection campaign and then let the election be stolen from you. Rudy and Sidney blew smoke up your ass And you're not running again you'll be lucky to not get thrown in jail for some cooked up bullshit.

1
Observer95 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are wrong. Trump did not listen to Sydney. Bless her soul she tried her best but he refused to listen to her advice. She had more fighting spirit than Trump. Colonel Wadron went to Trump in November with evidence of interference and how Trump could proceed in away that would expose it all and Trump did not listen to him either. Rudy might be his lawyer but Trump refused to listen to him either. Rudy and Sydney wanted him to get a special counsel for election fraud but Trump refused because he was listening to his white house counsel. Rudy and Tom Fitton wanted a special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden and Biden but again Trump did not listen. General Flynn tried and failed. Sydney wanted him to fire some people in his administration but again Trump did not listen.

Sorry to say this but it seems Trump gave up back in november and just let the process play out. He refused to listen to people who had fresh ideas and depended on his advisors who I doubt were looking out for his best interest. Brynn and Sydney said the people around him were telling him to concede. I guess after 6/1 he gave in.

1
Imyurhuckleberry 1 point ago +1 / -0

If there were evidence proving election fraud he'd have used it. I really don't buy that.

1
Observer95 1 point ago +1 / -0

But there is evidence proving election fraud.