592
Comments (123)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
85
southbeatz [S] 85 points ago +85 / -0

So Jack says banning Trump from Twitter can promote healthy conversation, so by removing one side of the conversation that is healthy? He also says it fragments public conversation yet he still banned Trump and others. He says banning someone divides us which is obviously true that it limits potential for clarification, redemption, learning yet he still banned people. He wants one humanity working together but really that means one world doing what he wants. He says if people do not agree with Twitter rules that they can find somewhere else to go and millions have done that lol. I won't respond to everything from his Twitter posts but I did screenshot them so that Twitter doesn't get extra traffic.

61
deleted 61 points ago +61 / -0
0
TychoDurandal 0 points ago +1 / -1

That money isn’t his to keep.

Remember after Steve Bing’s death, the supposed multi millionaire had little less than $500k in hard assets? The rest was earmarked for various trusts and his family was shocked and left squabbling over nothing.

Take note of how many billionaires proudly will declare that their children and grand children will receive no inheritance. That’s the tell. Even their wealth is fake because it’s never theirs to keep.