1133
Comments (37)
sorted by:
96
deleted 96 points ago +96 / -0
54
hereticpatriot 54 points ago +54 / -0

We live in post-constitutional times frens. If that really needed to be said at this point.

40
TrumpWonByALandslide 40 points ago +40 / -0

These people have balls. Fuck comrade Murphy.

37
Deadaim6 37 points ago +37 / -0

Somebody get Mike Lindell on the horn.

26
Lord_Kek 26 points ago +26 / -0

We're going to need the finest giza ropes.

17
JudicialDredd 17 points ago +17 / -0

Giza perma nap pillows. It'll take their breath away.

18
Dontdoxxxmeplease 18 points ago +18 / -0

I thought he won the case...!?

31
Anaconda 31 points ago +33 / -2

LMAO...there's a reason the baker in the 'gay wedding cake' shitshow is still going to have to fight in the SCOTUS. tranny-lover gorsuch agreed with kagan and the libshits to not make it a landmark decision and any gay couple can go and make a new case and force that baker to keep having to go back to the SCOTUS, wasting time and money

18
ChuckedBeef 18 points ago +18 / -0

Fuck Gorsuch, all three of Trump's appointments were mistakes. Gutless fucking frauds!

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
4
knightofday 4 points ago +4 / -0

The second part, that’s EXACTLY why they’ve been going so hard AGAINST gyms opening.

2
GuerillaYourDreams 2 points ago +2 / -0

My gym is open here in Florida but they’re requiring a mask for entry! I haven’t decided to humiliate myself yet...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
border_humper 2 points ago +2 / -0

You must be in the based part of Canada, wherever that is...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
border_humper 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s crazy that you have less spread than ON and QC. Isn’t Van just as dense as TO? Weird.

16
captainmawm 16 points ago +16 / -0

They hate you! They really do! They'll do anything to destroy you if you do not abide by their petty rules.

12
impera 12 points ago +12 / -0

What a fucking shitbird that governor is... so worried about supposed crimes, that they go out and commit massive robbery?

Maybe the next time someone is arrested they can steal the title deeds of the prison, the police station, and the courthouse, seize the local municipalities budget to set all the salaries of police, wardens and prisons staff, judges and court officers to zero, and send in the demolition teams to level all these buildings. Would that be justice?

These people..

11
Aambrick 11 points ago +12 / -1

It actually gives ground to sue the state for at least 1000x the amount at the least. It is grounds to bring it to the Supreme Court.

. . . Wait just a minute. Didn't the Supreme Court just admitted by their actions that they don't care about the people? Let's see allowing the fraud to go on and ignoring cases that actually does go directly to their jurisdiction seems to say yes to that question.

12
Hurricane 12 points ago +12 / -0

Same SC that'll refuse to hear the case?

5
Aambrick 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes, I believe that is the one.

5
Hurricane 5 points ago +5 / -0

For once I just want to be wrong.

1
Aambrick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same, but evidence is pointing to the opposite. Hope that I am mistaken though.

8
MemeLawd 8 points ago +9 / -1

I hope the worst possible outcome for these tyrants.

6
Proud_DudeGermany 6 points ago +6 / -0

So, when can we start calling this fascism?

5
streakybacon 5 points ago +5 / -0

On what supposed grounds did they sieze the money?

6
Shazxofshadilay 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's NJ.

4
PositiveEnergy 4 points ago +4 / -0

Full blown communism. They state is seizing his money. If that isn’t communism (the state taking our property) I don’t know what is.

3
JohnR23 3 points ago +3 / -0

We need to recognize that our money is not going to be secured unless it’s secured. What I’m talking about is that if you have money in an account with someone, the Feds can and will take it from you if you’re on their radar. It no longer matters how you got the money, they don’t care.

We need to start using a crypto, that way even if they want to take your money, you will have it secured via private key. I’m not sure which one we should be using, but we need to get it straightened out.

3
85Dacudo 3 points ago +4 / -1

If half the people on this site had just an ounce of testosterone these guys had, this dooming phase would have passed already.

2
knightofday 2 points ago +2 / -0

Absolute fact

2
Shazxofshadilay 2 points ago +2 / -0

(Smiles in Governor Murphy) Dude has the biggest teeth. Most corrupt state in the union.

1
Brendancs0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just speechless

1
AgnesDomini 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

The ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable intrusions by the government. However, the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee protection from all searches and seizures, but only those done by the government and deemed unreasonable under the law.

A seizure of property, within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, occurs when there is some meaningful interference with an individual’s possessory interests in the property.

All searches and seizures under Fourth Amendment must be reasonable.

The court will examine the totality of the circumstances to determine if the search or seizure was justified. When analyzing the reasonableness standard, the court uses an objective assessment and considers factors including the degree of intrusion by the search or seizure and the manner in which the search or seizure is conducted.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fourth_amendment

The government might be able to argue that it was reasonable to shut down gyms during a pandemic as justifiable action, but seizing a litigant's defense fund cannot possibly be construed as being a reasonable measure on the part of the government, which has no authority to strip and rob you of the means to challenge actions it has taken against you already.

States cannot allow conducts that violate the Fourth Amendment.

Where there was a violation of one’s fourth amendment rights by federal officials, a Bivens action can be filed against federal law enforcement officials for damages, resulting from an unlawful search and seizure. Under the Bivens action, the claimant needs to prove that there has been a constitutional violation of the fourth amendment rights by federal officials acting under the color of law.

Sue.His.Ass.

1
canadianamerican 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, thats just a fourth amendment infringement. The current government can do that. They routinely ignore the bill of rights...

1
GuerillaYourDreams 1 point ago +1 / -0

When Phil Murphy took office I told everyone he was full on communist, just like Tom Wolf of Pennsylvania!!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0